• Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 个月前

    I hate the loser as much as the next guy, but post scarcity built on automation and androids isn’t a bad thing just because he mentions it.

    • Ech@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 个月前

      It absolutely is a bad thing. There’s a version of “post scarcity” where everyone is provided for and cared for, and there’s the one these assholes are aiming for, where most are left to languish. His is unquestionably the latter.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 个月前

        Languish is a strong word, post scarcity heavily implies most of our desires being met, not a minimum to survive.

        It should still be the end goal in either case. Hopefully, we can have proper change before it to avoid some kind of techno feudalism.

        • Ech@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 个月前

          My point is that what he’s aiming for isn’t what you’re imagining or describing. He doesn’t want comfort or care for others, he wants to have as much money and power as he can possible claw in, and others having something means he has less to hoard. In short, he’s lying and it’s important to understand that.

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 个月前

            Hopefully we can have change so we get what he predicts and not what he wants.

          • arrow74@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 个月前

            It’s also not what this image is saying either.

            Yes we know what Musk actually wants, but what’s being described in the image is quite nice

            • Ech@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 个月前

              “The image about what the billionaire psycho is saying isn’t really about what the billionaire psycho is saying.”

              That’s not how this works.

              • arrow74@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 个月前

                Musk: “Don’t kill puppies”

                You: I’m going to kill so many fucking puppies

                This is where we are at right now. Yes we do know Musk is a bad guy, but even bad people can say good things.

                Having robots labor for us would be great, just because Musk said thay doesn’t make it evil. But because Musk said it we can infer he has some additional motives, but the statement itself is still a good thing

                Like we don’t have to be this unnecessarily absolute and obtuse about things.

                • Ech@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 个月前

                  You: I’m going to kill so many fucking puppies

                  I already said that there’s an actual good version of post-scarcity, good try though. And letting wolves in sheep’s fur lead you into the slaughterhouse because they put up a sign that says “Utopia” is just going to doom you and everyone else.

        • fartographer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 个月前

          Y’know, you can also achieve post scarcity by reducing the demand. And you can reduce the demand by reducing the number of people whose needs are too inconvenient or expensive to be met.

          He never implied or stated that a large populace would get to partake in this ketamine-induced fantasy land.

    • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 个月前

      Third, poverty could cease to exist RIGHT NOW if people like Elon Musk got the guillotine treatment they deserve

      Never forget that elmo ran his mouth about using his money to solve world hunger, and when the UN organization in charge of hunger came back with a detailed plan… nothing. Poof. The little shit tucked tail and ran.

      • jherazob@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 个月前

        Oh no we’re never forgetting that, or the fact that shortly after he used even MORE money than what the UN proposed to buy Twitter instead

  • Wytch@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 个月前

    They have been selling us the promise of leisurely utopia since the industrial revolution. The only way we get shorter work weeks is by sacrificing capitalists

  • Zephorah@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 个月前

    None of our billionaires are seeking a Star Trek, united federation of planets (countries) utopia, where money is obsolete.

    They’re all looking more towards the empire dystopia of Star Wars.

  • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 个月前

    Elon, you have the capacity to end world hunger, fix all American schooling problems, and dozens of other things, and still be a billionaire. If you were capable of even the slightest hint of empathy, you could create a near-utopia tomorrow.

    • lechekaflan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 个月前

      That, too.

      Infuriatingly, dystopian science fiction is supposed to be warnings about the excesses of capitalist feudalism, except techbros start to use those as goddamn instruction books.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 个月前

        Somehow they imagine themselves the hero, but they’re the contributors to the dystopia they create. Like the evil dictators that somehow can’t understand how twisted the world is they created.

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 个月前

    If done right and well, it most certainly could. But we aren’t doing either.

    • ZDL@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 个月前

      It’s the old tech shill’s shell game.

      “This is what we could have!” (Note: could have. Not what they’re working toward.)

      Television was once hailed as a boon for education. How long did that last?

      The Internet was once hailed as a means of learning about each other. Now it’s a source of ever-increasing vociferous division.

      All of this is purest fantasy because the people pitching it are shit humans who don’t want the future they sell to us.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 个月前

        In the heart of the empire, same as it ever was. I mbin “boosted” your comment, because it’s the same old pipe dream they’ve always sold us that we keep buying, with just enough “good” hits to keep us coming back, as I elsewhere.

      • Brosplosion@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 个月前

        What? Are you seriously gonna say that television and Internet weren’t a massive boon for society regarding education/knowledge sharing and social exchange? You’ve such a negative outlook on life if you honestly believe that.

        I remember when people would tell you things and you just had to say OK cause your only refute was to hop on over to the library and find a book as a source.

        And pre-Internet, when would you ever communicate with someone outside of your little town? Sure sign up for a penpal or some shit like that, but the ability for me where I am on the shitter to write this comment to you is INSANE in the broad spectrum of the human race.

        Stop being such a doomer

        • ZDL@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 个月前

          Yes, I’m going to say that television and the Internet weren’t a massive boon for society.

          Television (and streaming video later on) when it started off perhaps had potential to change things for the better. Now look at it. “Reality” shows, politically divisive opinion pieces masquerading as news, and in general just a pile of crud until you get into the individual paid channels … which benefit only those who can afford the increasingly expensive fees.

          Benefitting the rich? Yeah, that’s new and unexplored territory for sure!

          As for the Internet, again, when it was first unleashed on the public it was a GREAT place. Now it’s one walled garden after another with the only real concern the delivery of ads as often and as plentiful as possible. Its potential has been wasted. But hey, at least the warp speed spread of disinformation that it enables with such panache didn’t result in the ever-accelerating failure of democracies around the world!

  • brb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 个月前

    How is that a bad thing? It’s exactly what we all should be working towards.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 个月前

    People like this are described by Charles Dickens … rich, wealthy, entitled aholes that talk about “The surplus population”