They just keep coming up with even dumber ideas.

  • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    That middle one kind of sticks out. Seems perfectly valid if your usually walking/biking/using public transportation.

    • Goodeye8@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      You can still get a license in case you do need to drive a car. A license is not an obligation to buy a car.

      • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        This! There are probably gonna be times where you need to drive to get someone somewhere in a hurry. Cannot speak for everywhere, but in my part of the world the police won’t care if you are speeding to get someone to hospital, you’ll still get a ticket, minimum, without license.

    • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      The first one was ripped off from Zizek. The second one is because you have to ask WAYMO for permission for access to a vehicle.

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Still not sure what you are getting at. With sex and existing, those are themselves the goal, so having a machine do it for you makes no sense. With driving, getting from A to B is the goal, not the act of driving itself, which makes calling a normal cab or a robo-taxi both equally valid ways of achieving the goal if you don’t want to drive.