snoons@lemmy.ca to Fuck AI@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoGitHub Outages Since Microslop Acquisitionlemmy.zipexternal-linkmessage-square33linkfedilinkarrow-up1375arrow-down14file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1371arrow-down1external-linkGitHub Outages Since Microslop Acquisitionlemmy.zipsnoons@lemmy.ca to Fuck AI@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square33linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zip
minus-squareAlfalFaFail@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up11·edit-214 hours agoSame image with readable axis labels. Edit: Just to put it in perspective, that big spike is about 4 hours and 2 minutes of downtime for the month of May 2023. Sauce
minus-squareMrEff@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·13 hours agoThere are 44640 minutes in May. If it was out for 0.5% of them, it was down for 223.2 minutes. The data point is a little bit less, but not much. It is closer to having been down for 3.5 hours.
minus-squareBigDiction@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·14 hours agoReal triple 99.9% is pretty hard to achieve on a massive service.
minus-squarejust_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 hours agoThat’s not the point of the post tho? It was hitting 99.9% before acquisition. Unless you want to say that github only became massive after MS acquisition
minus-squareBigDiction@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoI don’t know anything concrete, but MS may report downtime differently, and have more strict requirements for reporting downtime. I’ve seen it happen at another ‘start up’ that got acquired and suddenly started reporting way more downtime events than prior to acquisition.
minus-squarejust_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 hour agoThat actually may be true, but honestly my personal/anecdotal evidence also shows github being down more since atleast a couple of years.
Same image with readable axis labels.
Edit: Just to put it in perspective, that big spike is about 4 hours and 2 minutes of downtime for the month of May 2023. Sauce
There are 44640 minutes in May. If it was out for 0.5% of them, it was down for 223.2 minutes. The data point is a little bit less, but not much. It is closer to having been down for 3.5 hours.
Real triple 99.9% is pretty hard to achieve on a massive service.
That’s not the point of the post tho?
It was hitting 99.9% before acquisition. Unless you want to say that github only became massive after MS acquisition
I don’t know anything concrete, but MS may report downtime differently, and have more strict requirements for reporting downtime.
I’ve seen it happen at another ‘start up’ that got acquired and suddenly started reporting way more downtime events than prior to acquisition.
That actually may be true, but honestly my personal/anecdotal evidence also shows github being down more since atleast a couple of years.
Thanks!