(not my image. I just find these comical and incredibly dangerous)

  • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    12 days ago

    They aren’t. There might be places with shitty cops that tolerate them. (Quick search shows this is mostly a Texas thing)

    • protist@retrofed.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      12 days ago

      They aren’t.

      Confidently incorrect. Maybe they’re illegal some places, but definitely not most places. In Texas, they’re not illegal, but it can be illegal if they make your vehicle more than 8 feet wide. Since they’re usually on sedans, they usually don’t hit 8 feet.

      Also they’re more specifically a thing in Black culture in Houston. I see them pretty rarely in other Texas cities

      • baines@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        12 days ago

        what? they are a pedestrian hazard, how would these not be illegal in every state?

      • M137@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        Americans proving their inability to understand their country isn’t the world just never stops.
        You’d ever only see these in the US, it doesn’t matter if they’re specifically illegal elsewhere because it just doesn’t happen (on normal roads, outside very rare shows etc.).
        It’s so fucking tiring not being able to get away from 'Muricans like you who are so deep into their own shit that you’re unable to even start to understand anything else.

    • sartalon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      12 days ago

      It’s pretty common to see these on the road in Houston, Texas.

      Oh wait, you said “civilized world”, my bad.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      12 days ago

      Surprisingly, even Brazil is more civilized in that regard. Tires and rims may not extend laterally farther than front or rear bumpers.

      The downside is that people weaponize the sound system, so they don’t even need to be driving to be hostile to everyone within 300 meters.

      • amgine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        12 days ago

        Cars with these rims usually have outdoor external speakers on the bottom. So they weaponized the wheels and sound.

      • BillyClark@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        In the US, what is street legal depends on the locality, most of which is decided by the different states. I heard that in one state, the rule was that tires and rims couldn’t extend farther than the side mirrors, and so these people made their side mirrors stick out a lot farther too.

    • huppakee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 days ago

      Thanks.

      Swangas (also spelled swangaz, and colloquially known as elbows (or elbos), 83s, or 84s (or simply 4s)) are custom extended wire-spoke wheel rims associated with slab car culture of Houston, Texas

      Slab (sometimes in all capital letters) is an acronym for “slow, loud, and bangin’” that describes a custom car, music and surrounding culture that’s associated with African American hip-hop culture that emerged in the Houston area.

        • protist@retrofed.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          12 days ago

          Sure, but they they also define “unroadworthy,” and this isn’t it. To be clear I think these are awful and would prefer they were illegal, it’s just that they genuinely aren’t a lot of the time

          • VinegarChunks@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            12 days ago

            In South Carolina the law text is broad.

            It shall be unlawful for any person to drive or move or for the owner to cause or knowingly permit to be driven or moved on any highway any vehicle or combination of vehicles which is in such an unsafe condition as to endanger any person or property

            • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              12 days ago

              And yet I still see Carolina squats on bigass trucks. Their front blind spot has to be hundreds of feet at least.

              • VinegarChunks@lemmus.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                I see squats riding around, too, and there is another explicitly written law against that. My impression is that SC cops don’t enforce traffic/vehicle laws at all unless you are doing something especially egregious.

      • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        common sense?

        But seriously, nothing can stick out beyond the body of the car (expect mirrors), not even wheels.

        Edit: After checking the laws says the fender has to cover the tire to prevent splashing so it may not apply to rims like that. So back to common sense

        • protist@retrofed.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          Common sense is not a law…

          Also the laws are different in different jurisdictions

          • Jiral@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            I am not a lawyer but EU Regulation No 1009/2010 on type approval requirements for wheel guards states:

            2.1.1. In the part formed by radial planes at an angle of 30° towards the front and 50° towards the rear of the centre of the wheels (see Figure 1), the overall width (q) of the wheel guard shall be at least sufficient to cover the total tyre width (b) taking into account the tyre envelope as well as the extremes of the tyre/wheel combination(s) as specified by the manufacturer. In the case of twin wheels, the tyre envelopes and total width over the two tyres (t) shall be taken into account.

            In short: Nothing is allowed to extend beyond the wheel guards. Now, look at the image above again.

            Deviating materially from the type approval makes your car not street legal as far as I understand. But this is a matter for a lawyer. Surely there is a reason why these psychopathic car mods are impossible to find in all of the EU on public roads.

              • Jiral@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                11 days ago

                I did not quote “common sense” I quoted relevant law. If you want a full legal analysis rather than seeing relevant law, you need to pay a lawyer.

    • Ravenheart@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 days ago

      They’re surprisingly common in the Houston area. If they’re illegal, you certainly wouldn’t assume they are based on how often you see them.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 days ago

          Lol here (Estonia, not the US), they get a perverse pleasure out of giving people tickets, some of them anyway. If a cop saw those things, that car would rightfully get its annual inspection voided and potentially the driver would be forced to take it off the road immediately rather than being allowed to drive home or to a workshop to get it fixed.

          A lot of the time I disagree with how ticket-happy they can be (it’s not always about safety critical things), but in this case I’d agree with them 100%.

  • Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    They aren’t in any civilised countries, probably land you in prison when you are driving that on any public road in one of those.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    According to Alexander’s tactics in Gaugamela, you first have to wear them down with javelins, and then open ranks to create alleys for them to pass through your infantry, then finish them off with hypaspists. Afterwards, you can charge your cavalry straight to Darius himself and win the battle.

    Piece of cake really.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    12 days ago

    There’s zero chance these are legal. And even in places where enforcement of such things is lax, is be surprised if this lasted very long, simply because of how crazy dangerous it would be to pedestrians and cyclists.

  • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    11 days ago

    Just cause they have them doesn’t make them legal. Cops probably don’t even know so they just let it go

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Usually, US law enforcement errs on the side of illegal since they have the presumption of good faith (or at least did until ICE went gonzo about lies and cover-ups).

      But anything that looks suspicious counts as probable cause meaning they can search you and relieve you of cash and valuables. Nowadays, they presume they can jusy rob you and it enhances the precinct budget for fun stuff.

      We see this kind of overpolicing done more to minorities than whites, but so long as you don’t look super rich (enough to have a lawyer on your contacts list) then you’re fair game.

      If this sort of thing is uncommon in their parts, it’s going to draw more attention than a red sports car.

  • LoOroBob@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    12 days ago

    Aren‘t vehicles and/or custom parts checked for safety and roadworthiness in the US??? 😱

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      12 days ago

      Not in Texas. I can basically guarantee that this is in houston, they are all over the place down there. They’re called elbows or swangas and are popular throughout the “slow loud and bangin”(slab) car culture native to the area.

      • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 days ago

        In South Florida we have late model Chevy sedans jacked up 2 feet with 40+inch rims, candy paint jobs, and one time I saw a Caprice with “truck nuts” clearly custom made from soccer balls. I’ll take them any day over this.

        • amgine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          Houston went through that phase a long time ago. Surprised it’s still around

    • bassgirl09@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      12 days ago

      Depends on what state you live in if there are mandatory vehicle inspections (20 of 50 states do NOT have vehicle inspections). The state I live in does not have any mandatory vehicle inspections.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Actually, 38 of 50 states don’t have periodic vehicle inspections.

        Most countries require annual safety inspections.

        • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          That is insane. So they drive their car into the dirt until it’s falling apart with no consideration of other roads users. Just insane

      • Burninator05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        12 days ago

        My state does have inspections but they are going away after the state admitted all they cared about was the fee. Personally, I don’t think they mattered with the number of vehicles I see on a regular basis with valid stickers and obvious safety issues.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Some of them are surprisingly legal, depending on the width of the car. They’re popular in Houston, and so long as the total width of the vehicle doesn’t exceed 102 inches they may be legal in Texas. Lots of them do make the vehicle wider than 8 feet, but for probable cause it has to be glaringly obvious they’re over 102 inches, and that’s not always legally clear. They mostly get tickets for them if they get pulled over for something else and the cops measure them during the stop.

      And Texas no longer requires inspections as of like 2 years ago. But they could just remove them before inspections before anyway.

    • Noxy@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      i have never in my 24 years of owning and driving 13 cars while living in two US states experienced such a mandatory check.

      I’ve very distant memories of emissions tests but that was strictly exhaust or OBDII checks specifically for emissions.

      Never safety or roadworthiness.

  • Doom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    12 days ago

    I don’t know. Why are semi trucks allowed to have these?

    I see them all the time even though they seem like a liability for a professional driver.

    • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      I’ve seen those sharp things on a pickup truck’s wheels

      A few months ago a pickup truck cut me off and i crashed into its side and fell into the side of the wheel. If the truck i hit had these spikes, i’d be dead

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 days ago

      The idea is the driver can see if a lug nut is missing. They are typically just plastic, but would still shred a pedestrian or cyclist, two members of the woke left.

    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      You really don’t see them as much compared to when they were in their hay day, because they were/are a liability. But current ones are soft plastic with a thin metallic coating.

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Fast rotating “soft plastic with thin metallic coating” will just as well mutilate or even kill pedestrians or cyclists in a collision. But then US Americans do not seem to care much about those.

        • NotBillMurray@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 days ago

          Let’s be real, if you’re close enough that these are hitting you you’re getting hit by the multi ton truck as well. They’re a little silly, but not the huge hazard you’re making them out to be.

          • Jiral@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 days ago

            They make a wide vehicle even wider, for no good reason, your argument, can really only be made by an American who can not fathom that oversized roads are not only not the norm everywhere but are in themselves antipedestrian and get pedestrians and cyclists needlesly killed. There is also a good reason why tyre/axle parts extending beyond fenders are illegal in for example the EU. They are a risk to others in many ways, not only collission but also projecting stuff outwards. Last but not least, they make it harder for the driver to properly estimate the total width of the vehicle and invite driver error that can cost lives.

            They are illegal in the EU and they are so for a reason.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      12 days ago

      They put them on to keep cars from crowding them, which they do have a legit problem with. I don’t really care as long as they stay in their lane it’s just psychological. The first time the wander a little into my line and tear up my car, i’m going to own their ass.

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        12 days ago

        No, it is not just psychological, this stuff is real and absolutely mutilating towards any pedestrian or cyclist and also dangerous for other car drivers (doesn’t matter if they are just fake plastic or not). There is a reason this is not tolerated pretty much anywhere other than parts of the US.

      • blackbrook@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        It’s not illegal or unreasonable to use a bit of someone else’s lane when you can do so without getting unsafely close to them. For example, if you are in the right lane and there is someone changing a tire on the shoulder and you want to give them some space. These are not going to be easy to see from certain perspectives, and are kind of asking for someone to misjudge their car width.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          The big trucks have 2 ft to play with. They max out at 9 ft wide in an 11ft lane. and if they wander into the next lane incorrectly, they’re responsible for 53 ft and are far more likely to kill someone.

          Ode to local statutes, in most states (all the ones I checked) it is absolutely illegal to operate in other people’s lanes.

          Statute: California Vehicle Code (CVC) § 21658(a)

          Statute: Virginia Code § 46.2-804

          Maryland Transportation Article § 21-309

          Look, I don’t love the wheel grinders, but what you wrote is not factual

          • blackbrook@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 days ago

            Ok you got me, I don’t know the vehicle codes of every state, nor am I an expert on them in any state. But I can tell you that people drifting into other lanes on occasion is a thing that happens, usually without it being a big deal. Sometimes by mistake though I gave you a scenario where it is arguably reasonable. I don’t dispute that it can also be dangerous, especially with big trucks.

            While of course the lanes are there for a reason and should not be ignored, the relative positions of cars is the more important thing and our visual sense of where other vehicles is a thing we generally take in from the vehicle body and the expected consistent shape of them. And it is what we intuitively use when having to make sudden maneuver. Making your car have an unexpected shape and width below the body is asking for trouble.

        • Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          illegal or unreasonable to use a bit of someone else’s lane

          Yes it is? There are specific rules for passing cyclists and who has the right of way? If you are drifting out of your lane and/or without specific markings for a wide vehicle you are liable for collisions?

    • BigPotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Look, you spent all that money on your Cadillac, you can’t just look like everyone else. They gotta know it’s you! Swangas stand out from the crowd. Whistle tips on the exhaust (only in the mornings, when you supposed to be up making breakfast) let everyone know you’re coming. You don’t have to hide. You’re the king of the block, no, the city. No need for subtlety.

      Put a cow catcher on the front of your truck and lift it three feet! Put underglow on your (Automatic) Honda and a JDM tow hook! Make it so your car sounds like gravel in a trash can at 60kph!

      Basically, people like to customize their very expensive decisions. You don’t have to worry about accidents because they’re not going to happen to you.