• FoxAlive@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    4 days ago

    It was something like 70% of all malware originates from the google play store. Yet to make you safe you can’t download apps outside of google play.

    Lol.

    • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s not to make you safe. It is to Co troll what you download. As a side effect, you also are restricted to install cracked apps e.g. Revanced apps.

      Nobody cared about viruses and nobody will. They just state so for normies to believe and agree.

  • gedfromgont@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    4 days ago

    Its a shit process. If they’d just get rid of the 24h countdown it be bearable. But thats exactly the tactic, isn’t it, make it as shitty as you can, then you dial it back just a notch so people feel like that is better, even though it is still worse than the original process.

      • hansolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 days ago

        No. It likely looks for external timekeeping from a carrier.

        It also only gives you a 1 hour window when the 24 are done to turn on sideloading. So set an alarm.

        • 8uurg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          4 days ago

          That one hour window did me in and had to wait another 24. The option is nearly impossible to find, there is no notification when the timer has completed, and there is no indication that you only have an hour ahead of time. I think this qualifies as the option not existing for the average person, even when told about it.

          • hansolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            4 days ago

            It takes the dedication of a FOSS enthusiast or a scammer out for money. Which is why it’s not really meant to work stopping scams.

  • mesa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    4 days ago

    Its just Linux too. This is a very stupid thing and will only accelerate true linux phones becoming popular.

  • cybernihongo@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 days ago

    I was wondering when this would come. Even popped open DuckDuckGo and searched for Android news, yet this completely escaped the radar.

    I’ve already removed the verifier and safetycore apps and installed stubs in their place. I also already had Shizuko and now I have gained root access on top of it without unlocking the bootloader.

    Google may fuck themselves.

      • cybernihongo@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Because I have access to neither on my Xiaomi phone. I do have access to other custom ROMs though but unlocking the bootloader will wipe my data. As soon as I’m ready, I’m considering LineageOS or any of the other available ROMs.

      • cybernihongo@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I have not used this particular repo but from what I read, it does what it should be doing, replace the real hidden apps with placeholder stubs that have version 2000000 or something to that effect. You should be good with this one. Make sure to read all of the readme carefully, particularly the uninstall methods.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 days ago

    How is this legal? Serious question, how can it be legal for a company to dictate what I install on my own computing devices?

    Dobtngive me the security crap, that is just a cheap excuse

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    Shit like this is why I run lineage OS and there’s a very good chance that my next phone is going to be running post-market OS and not Android at all.

  • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Google would rather block potential competition than attempt to fix their own product.

    • The Playstore is inundated with fake reviews and paid for discoveribility, pushing awful predatory apps to the top.
    • Many (I assume, it was several from my small collection) niche clean apps left the play store after increased requirements proved not worth the hassle for the small Devs.
    • Lots of people report issues with Google Play cards.
    • Lots of people report being billed for things that they did not consent to.
    • Google Play support appears to be useless.
    • https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.gplaynews.com

    So the Playstore sucks and it burns too many of their potential customers, resulting in churn instead of retention. Consequently it has seen very little growth since Covid: https://www.businessofapps.com/data/google-play-statistics/ . The potential for growth was there though, as can be seen with the apple app store: https://www.businessofapps.com/data/apple-app-store-statistics/

    And as a cherry on top, Google has recently started billing cc chargeback fees to developers. I don’t know a single other large digital shop platform that does this. More costs and more administration for Devs, which will make the Playstore even less attractive for hobby Devs with a niche passion project.

  • godsammitdam@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    Oh, I forgot that was happening now. Because I’m not on a closed OS and can download whatever I want. You can be too, fuck Google.

  • nullspace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    4 days ago

    once you’ve waited 24 hours, you can choose to allow sideloading for seven days or indefinitely.

    I know I’m going against the current here, but I don’t think this is a bad change at all. It’s a step to protect normies from themselves who, despite how inconceivable it is to fall for this kind of scam, are actually even dumber than that.

    I do think it’s reasonable to be worried about future changes that further restrict sideloading. It’s often how these restrictions are slowly implemented. But where it’s at now with this change in particular I’m cool with.

    • Feyd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      4 days ago

      Installing apks isn’t even how normies get scammed, and there are tons of malicious apps on the play store itself. This is an anticonsumer, anticompetitive power grab, plain and simple. Users should be able to do whatever they want with their expensive pocket computers and any other opinion is shameful corporate bootlicking.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      4 days ago

      Normies keep falling for scams all the time. They fall for scam on windows, over the phone and in person. We generally try to come up with rules that protect normies without overly complicating lives for everyone else. Like I have to go to a bank personally to increase single transaction limit over certain amount but I don’t have unlock some secret options and wait 24 hours every time I want to wire money to a new account.

      A warning saying “this app is not trusted, don’t install it if someone else instructed you to do so” would be enough here. Advanced users should be able to disable this warning. That’s it.

      • nullspace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I don’t have unlock some secret options and wait 24 hours every time I want to wire money to a new account.

        A lot of services will do the verification step where it sends a few cents to and from a newly linked account which can take 1-3 business days. You only do it the one time. It’s a small speed bump that prevents millions of dollars in fraud every year.

        To me this change to sideloading is a very similar speed bump. You do it the one time then set it to allow sideloading indefinitely. That’s where it’s at now.

        If they move to extend the delay or strip out the “indefinite” option then yeah, freak the fuck out and grab some pitchforks because that’s not good at all. But where this specific change is at I see it as more anti-fraud than anti-consumer.

    • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      My device that I own shouldn’t be able to prevent me from using it however I wish, especially just because a bunch of people are too stupid and will break their own shit. Fuck em.

    • hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ugh. You’re not wrong, but I wouldn’t say you’re really “right” here either.

      Scammers will find a way around this. They always do. But it puts a significant, real burden on people that own their devices and want to things perfectly within legal and social norms. In a legal sense, it “limits enjoyment of one’s own property.” Which is the same kind of term used for when the stink from a pig farm makes it impossible to go outside. The pork lobby doesn’t make the decision to keep the farm, a local judge does because it’s about the individual not allowed to use their property how they like.

      This limits my enjoyment of my property, and doesn’t actually solve any real problems. It’s an excuse to lock down the OS for closed commercial use.

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Anybody who has an opinion about these things and doesn’t just accept everything Big Tech throws at them saw (something like this) developing for years, nay decades, and had plenty of time to move on. So who exactly “hates it” now? I suspect it’s the typical Android App developer who always has one eye on monetization and is therefore willing to accept a lot of shit from the OS they’re devleoping for until it affects them directly.

    Not that I don’t agree with them.

    • gedfromgont@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      and had plenty of time to move on

      Sorry, do you mean developers or users, and where exactly do you think one can move to? IPhones? GrapheneOS is still restricted to Pixels and while the Motorolla collab is starting up they already announced that they start with flagship type phones, meaning expensive.

      • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        These are by far not the only options.

        Wait, you didn’t even mention LineageOS? Since it doesn’t come with Gapps/Playstore it’s unaffected by any of this.