Clarification: I’m not talking about sex. I’m talking about biological exposition.

  • Dave@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    We are human, we have done almost this exact thing for thousands of years and leave ecosystem devastation in our wake.

    People with rockets would absolutely go down to that planet without a second thought.

    • queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sometimes I think about how so many of us look up at the stars and wonder “if there really are aliens out there, why aren’t they colonizing the galaxy as fast as possible, as any intelligent species would naturally do?” like it’s the thing just anyone looking at the stars might think. we might be the horrifying biomechanical paperclip maximizer that the other aliens in the galaxy have to band together to defeat or face extermination.

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 days ago

      intergalactic tour guide: now if you look to your left, you’ll see the natural habitats of the Xpheno217 species. This is the only location in the whole universe they can live. And to your right, a brand new residential community fit with Walmart and their very own Chick-fil-A.

  • Inucune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    What does that life taste like? Someone will figure out how to prepare a dish that is truly out of this world.

  • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 days ago

    On the other hand, the two biologies could be so different from each other that they don’t interact at all.

    • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is an interesting idea. If neither biologies used the same fuel molecules then they wouldn’t compete for resources, but perhaps they would compete for space? But then if both biologies were that different from each other would they be able to even live in the same environment?

      • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        The sci-fi book Children of Ruin (sequel to Children of Time) covers this somewhat. There humans encounter a planet with a breathable atmosphere but with a toxic environment that slowly kills them.

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    5 days ago

    That won’t stop humanity. I’ve seen enough movies to know that a man-eating crazy alien monster infestation isn’t enough to keep people off some rock they found.

    And they’ll bring that shit home too.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 days ago

      And they’ll bring that shit home too.

      Of course, why would you leave your new significant other in outerspace?

      • slazer2au@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        More importantly the most advanced labs are on earth. Would you leave something so dangerous to a second rate lab?

  • termaxima@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Isn’t it also possible that their biology would be different enough that there would be basically no interaction ? 🤷🏻‍♀

    I don’t think we have any micro-organisms that would be particularly dangerous to silicon-based life, for example, if we did I’d expect it would be a problem already for our computers and everything made of glass ?

  • zeca@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Life is already unpredictable. We can take some safety measures, but we cant pretend that not doing this particular thing is going to keep our history under control. We dont have anything under control.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    But how else am I supposed to get green *Orion trader women on my arm?

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 days ago

    If the biology is different enough, things like viruses wouldn’t easily cross between the planets. But bacteria could still probably exploit us (and them), and nothing would stop things with claws, teeth, and spikes from hurting us even if they couldn’t ultimately digest us.

  • scytale@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    We won’t even be able to reach it until we can figure out FTL travel or technology that can support multi-generational passenger ships to get there.

    • Xaphanos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      FTL travel implies a mastery over spacetime itself. After that, a practical time machine is a matter of engineering details.

      We can be sure that we never get there because we are not flooded with tourists from the future. QED.

      • toynbee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        As a kid, I once heard the theory that aliens are actually time travelers fucking with people.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        i wouldnt call it mastery, implies you can control spacetime as well, just finding ways around the speed of light limitations.

        at least beings shows that control are close to being godlike energy beings.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        That depends on the type of FTL we use. Some just require infinite energy or exotic particles to work. No mastery of spacetime needed.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I love the hubris of this argument. It’s the identical construction of guys who say a woman must be a lesbian if they reject thier advances.