Not sure “neat” is the word I’d use. Its existence doesn’t upset me, but I wouldn’t mind if it didn’t exist.
If you really want it, I can send it to you directly, or you can find it by googling “spider blowjob creepy” or something like that. (I specifically say “googling” because I was unsuccessful in finding it on DDG. I didn’t try other search engines.)
I don’t know what the gif’s origin is, but it was semi frequently posted on Reddit. To shamefully continue referencing Reddit, this probably wouldn’t be your proudest fap. (I originally said “I can assure you” but then again … You did request the gif and I don’t know you.)
edit: Improved my originally very cavalier approach to grammar. Did not change the message of the post.
edit 2: Apparently the appeal of this was more widespread than I thought. I didn’t want to post it publicly because I don’t know how all of the clients handle image previews and didn’t want to force the image on anyone; also I couldn’t validate the quality or security of the website I found when searching it, but if you really want to see a spider blowing a guy, here it is.
This is similar to a classic, very not safe for work gif involving a woman dressed as a spider.
To my shame, many of my friends are Chrome users.
If my efforts to correct them continue to be unsuccessful, they may never know the joy of reader mode. It’s truly sad.
Fair enough, I can respect that.
Nowadays most Linux users seem to use ssh user@host
. When I was getting started, that didn’t exist (or at least I was unaware of it) so I still frequently use the -l
flag instead.
Nothing wrong with it, just that at least I mostly encounter its use by experienced users.
You, like me, must be old.
I also frequently pass -l
to the ssh
command.
Homer Simpson instead recommends rolling it up and letting it unfurl in your stomach.
It seems like it would be difficult to put anything under the skin without some form of wound.
My culinary knowledge is not sufficient to usefully comment on this.
Ah, I apologize, I did not intend to mock. Both sound potentially appealing. Thanks for the clarification!
I generally agree with you, but wasn’t SELinux primarily the NSA and Tresys? I know it’s a primarily Red Hat thing now, but I think it would have existed in some form without them.
It is entirely possible I’m misinformed.
That last statement seems like it cannot be true in this context.