• sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 minutes ago

      I have a feeling this was done on purpose… The regime didn’t like how the first movie resoanted a little too much with the plebs for their comfort.

      So they made a movie to alienate the core audience. But that’s just some tinfoil.

      • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        First film was a great film if it were new IP, but a shit joker batman film. The second film was always likely to be shit, because they were always going for abstract and avant garde artistry without a clear connection to the underlying and far stronger story and IP people are expecting. I’m sure it’s a beautiful film and musical, but it’s dog shit attached to joker.

    • Quazatron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The only good musicals (where people start singing for no reason) that I actually love are Blues Brothers and Monty Python’s Holly Grail.

      I’d watch it if it was a heavy dark drama. A musical? I think not.

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      have to agree. i was kinda looking forward to it… but a musical? gad. no. the worst episodes of my favorite shows are when they thought it would be cute to make them musicals.

        • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          if youre referring to the nightman; i would argue that they put on a musical within the show. the episode itself was not a musical.

          the other episode that is a musical is not one i particularly enjoy