My alts:
- @TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml (2021 - present)
- @TheImpressiveX@lemm.ee (2024 - 2025; RIP lemm.ee)
- @TheImpressiveX@lemmy.today (2025 - present)
- @TheImpressiveX@piefed.social (2025 - present)
- 308 Posts
- 158 Comments
TheImpressiveX@lemmy.mlto Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Are there any actual guides to remuxing?English131·7 months ago- Acquire a Blu-ray disc.
- Insert disc in your computer’s optical drive.
- Use MakeMKV to copy the contents of the disc into .mkv files.
- ???
- Profit!
TheImpressiveX@lemmy.mlto Linux@lemmy.ml•Wouldn't development of ReactOS from a larger community ultimately help ALL OS's?12·7 months agoWhat incident?
TheImpressiveX@lemmy.mlOPto Movies@lemmy.world•Moana 2 Should Be The Death Of The Direct-To-Streaming Blockbuster Movie - SlashFilmEnglish2·7 months agoApologies.
If you’re reading this, odds are you’ve at least seen some headline online to the effect of “‘Moana 2’ made a ridiculous amount of money at the box office.” That’s true. However, box office nerds such as myself have dug a lot deeper and can tell you that “Moana 2” absolutely shattered the Thanksgiving weekend record with a $386 million global debut over the five-day Wednesday-to-Sunday holiday stretch. As of this writing, the sequel has already made more than $405 million worldwide and will soon be one of the top 10 biggest movies of the year across the planet. Not bad for a movie that was originally going to be a Disney+ TV series, eh?
That’s truly the big point that needs to be examined here. Originally, Disney intended to make a “Moana” sequel that would have premiered directly on Disney+. Let’s forget for a moment that it was intended to be a show, which was likely to help keep subscribers hooked for multiple weeks, rather than a one-and-done. The point is that Disney now has a monster global hit that has turned a beloved 2016 animated film into a full-on franchise. This certainly bodes well for the live-action “Moana” coming our way in 2026.
More than that, in a rational world, this would signify the death of the big direct-to-streaming movie. For years, Hollywood has been chasing the success that Netflix found in the streaming game. That accelerated after the pandemic began and Disney+ has been one of the most successful upstarts in this arena. That said, the benefit of a big theatrical release as opposed to a direct-to-streaming title is clear.
There’s simply no longer a rational argument for the latter release strategy. It’s been clear for some time, admittedly, but “Moana 2” should be the final nail in the coffin.
Moana 2 would have been completely wasted as a streaming series
Let’s rewind the clock a little bit. “Moana” was released in 2016 and went on to make $686 million at the box office, in addition to winning some Oscars. That was at a time before Hollywood truly became obsessed with streaming. Generally speaking, Disney would turn a hit into a franchise with a theatrical sequel. The days of direct-to-home-media animated Disney sequels made by Disneytoon Studios have been over for some time.
Instead, Disney+ launched in 2019. Then the pandemic happened and every studio in the business rushed to launch a streaming service, believing that theatrical was dead and that streaming was the only future. Disney, for what it’s worth, did a damn good job of getting people on board, using “Star Wars” shows like “The Mandalorian” and Marvel series like “WandaVision” to attract subscribers. Even in those situations, however, the shows seemed to have diluted the theatrical viability of those franchises in certain ways. That’s something that even Disney CEO Bob Iger has acknowledged. “We have Marvel at home,” would be one way to look at it.
Cut to now. Disney+ has nearly 159 million subscribers globally. The studio has released dozens upon dozens of big Disney+ exclusives based on popular IP, as well as originals. But what is the most-streamed movie on the service? “Moana.” That’s right! For all of the investment in original streaming content, a theatrical hit from 2016 is the most-watched movie on Disney+. The popularity of the film on the service undoubtedly contributed to the blockbuster opening weekend for “Moana 2,” a movie that is now on track to become the studio’s third $1 billion grosser of 2024 after “Deadpool & Wolverine” ($1.33 billion) and “Inside Out 2” ($1.69 billion), which now ranks as the biggest animated film of all time.
Might “Moana 2,” be it as a movie or a TV show, have contributed to some Disney+ sign ups? Sure. But it’s truly hard to imagine that dumping the project directly to the streaming service would have had the same cultural impact. More importantly, it wouldn’t have made Disney nearly as much money. Now, Disney is going to make a fortune at the box office alone, given the sequel’s estimated $150 million production budget.
Streaming releases don’t have the same cultural staying power
“Moana 2” will also go on to have a healthy run on VOD and sell a bunch of merchandise along with some Blu-rays, even if that market isn’t as big as it once was. Then, after all of that, the film will arrive on Disney+, where it will likely do huge numbers because the entire world will be aware that the movie exists. People will have either been eagerly anticipating the opportunity to watch it at home, or kids will be eager to rewatch it (or both). Either way, it’s still going to be a big hit on Disney+ in addition to everything else.
In essence, whatever success “Moana 2” sees on Disney+ can now be icing on the cake, rather than having to justify the whole enterprise. Is this to say that a “Moana” series of some kind wouldn’t make sense? Of course not. Pixar made “Inside Out 2” and it also has a Disney+ spin-off series coming out titled “Dream Productions,” which seems suited to a TV format. On the flip side, so many streaming shows feel like movies that have been chopped up into episodes. Case in point, Disney was able to turn a series into a movie very convincingly with “Moana 2.”
Even if “Moana 2” hadn’t been this big of a success at the box office, it still would have made more sense playing in theaters then going direct-to-streaming. Look at “Encanto,” a movie that made just $261 million worldwide. But that theatrical release paved the way for the film to become a monster streaming hit on Disney+ down the line. Time and time again, we see that movies released in theaters do better on VOD and streaming, even if they weren’t outright hits in theaters.
At one time, there was a sense the theatrical market might fade away in the aftermath of the pandemic. Theaters have since by and large recovered from the 2020 lockdowns, so there’s no longer any real reason to continue holding onto that fear. Rather, in the future, Disney and every other studio in town would be better off spending large sums of money on movies that have a chance of doing well at the box office. Releasing such projects direct-to-streaming feels like the equivalent of setting cash on fire. In an increasingly uncertain media landscape, it makes zero sense. Take the hits where you can get them.
“Moana 2” is in theaters now.
TheImpressiveX@lemmy.mlOPto Movies@lemmy.world•Margot Robbie Baffled Over ‘Babylon’ Flop and ‘Still Can’t Figure Out Why People Hated It’: ‘I Wonder If in 20 Years People’ Will Be Shocked It BombedEnglish6·8 months agoCritical success does not always translate to financial success.
Box office gross is not an indicator of a film’s quality, or lack thereof.
TheImpressiveX@lemmy.mlOPto Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Ironically, since I started pirating, I've spent MORE money on movies.English1·8 months agoHandbrake only converts an existing Blu-ray rip to a video format, it doesn’t rip DVDs and Blu-rays on its’ own.
You can install MakeMKV to rip your discs, then convert them to video files in HandBrake.
TheImpressiveX@lemmy.mlOPto Movies@lemmy.world•Star Wars Trilogy: Simon Kinberg To Write & Produce For LucasfilmEnglish3·8 months agoTell me about the Wookiees, George (Lucas)!
TheImpressiveX@lemmy.mlOPto Movies@lemmy.world•Clint Eastwood's "Juror #2" is confirmed to end its theatrical run this Thursday after just one week in theaters, and will arrive on streaming by the end of the year.English24·8 months agoI don’t think Hollywood has figured out how to reach people like me yet. I’ve noticed a drastic drop in movie marketing in the last few years.
It’s because you use uBlock Origin and Pi-hole, and you’re on the Fediverse, which is very hostile to advertising.
Never leave the home directory without it!
TheImpressiveX@lemmy.mlOPto Movies@lemmy.world•Todd Phillips: Movie Theaters Should Ban Commercials Before FilmsEnglish6·9 months agoNone of this “THE. TRAILER. STARTS. NOW” before the trailer starts
Trailers played in movie theaters do not include this. That is only used for online ads, because sometimes the trailer will play as a pre-roll ad and they don’t want people to skip it.
The trailer shouldn’t give the entire plot away
There’s a reason studios do this. They run focus groups for trailers, and studies have shown that the more plot they reveal, the more likely audiences will buy a ticket to see the movie.
TheImpressiveX@lemmy.mlto Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Bluray ripping on LinuxEnglish51·9 months agoThat is correct.
TheImpressiveX@lemmy.mlOPto Movies@lemmy.world•‘Venom: The Last Dance’ Devours $51M Overseas Through Friday As Offshore Auds Propel Worldwide Bow To Projected $180M – International Box OfficeEnglish21·9 months agoHas to do with Spider-Man, I think.
TheImpressiveX@lemmy.mlOPto Movies@lemmy.world•‘Venom: The Last Dance’ Devours $51M Overseas Through Friday As Offshore Auds Propel Worldwide Bow To Projected $180M – International Box OfficeEnglish4·9 months agoIt’s a Sonyverse movie, what do you think?
Reviews are mixed-to-negative. A lot of people are criticizing the plot, as it’s mostly a road trip buddy movie instead of carrying the vibe of the first two. Some are even saying it’s the worst of the trilogy.
Personally, I enjoyed it for what it is, but then again, I also enjoyed the Tomorrowverse, so maybe I have bad taste.
TheImpressiveX@lemmy.mlOPto Movies@lemmy.world•‘Venom: The Last Dance’ Devours $51M Overseas Through Friday As Offshore Auds Propel Worldwide Bow To Projected $180M – International Box OfficeEnglish81·9 months agoI believe people should care about how much money a movie makes. The more money it makes, the greater the likelihood that we will see more movies like it.
Like that has got to be the most uninteresting and capitalistic metric to judge a film.
No one is judging this movie, or any movie, based on how much it made. Box office gross has nothing to do with a film’s quality, or lack thereof.
I rate it a 10.10.0 out of 10.
TheImpressiveX@lemmy.mlOPto Anime@lemmy.ml•A John Wick anime prequel film is in development at Lionsgate.English7·9 months agoI agree on this. Some things should just be left to the audience’s imagination.
TheImpressiveX@lemmy.mlto Fediverse@lemmy.world•A lot of good stuff is happening in the fediverses!English13·9 months ago- The Website League, an island network that’s taking a very different approach
“Website League”? I like the sound of that. Like some sort of super team…
TheImpressiveX@lemmy.mlto Fuck Cars@lemmy.world•Ontario promises to pay for ripping out bike lanes that fail unannounced criteria.English3·9 months agoThe company or the politician?
If Kraven the Hunter is “not a bad film”, then I’m terrified to see what he considers a bad film.