• kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    1 month ago

    Hundreds of years of burning coal has spread mercury compounds all over the land, so that quite often when they build a new dam for hydroelectric power it’s dissolved into the water and ends up concentrated in fishes that people eat.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 month ago

      having to be careful about how much fish you eat due to mercury is one of the top dystopian things to me. People think about agriculture and grains with civilization but when you look at how important and common fish was to our diet for so long. Its crazy.

    • Toasticus@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Man, humans have fundamentally and irreversibly fucked up this planet. We burn coal, so we have that problem you mentioned. I learned recently how chemical companies have done decades of a poor job just dumping chemical waste wherever they want or developing things that does more harm than good at the planet’s expense.

      Enjoy it while it’s here I guess.

  • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    1 month ago

    There’s no way to make a backdoor for encryption that keeps the encryption secure. Politicians and government flunkies can’t seem to wrap their pea brains around that concept.

  • 18107@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Adding an extra lane to a congested road will always cause that road to be more congested, and will also increase traffic on nearby roads.

    When China removed a highway, it reduced car traffic thought the entire city while not reducing the number of people travelling to and around the city.

    The only solution to car traffic is viable alternatives to driving.

    • DisasterTransport@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      Tangential but nobody seems to know how to drive in traffic. Pick a lane and stay in it, leave extra following distance, and try to change speed as smoothly as possible. If everyone did these three things, traffic congestion would be significantly less severe.

      • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Don’t forget zipper merging. I lived in an area where hundreds of hours spent commuting allowed me to observe the inability to merge was the primary driver of freeway congestion.

        • DisasterTransport@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          The main problem I’ve observed with zipper merging is nobody can seem to agree on what it is. People get aggressive when you try to use the available space on the road, and in discussions online it seems people think you’re trying to queue jump if you don’t merge as early as possible.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Probably not always. You build a 12 lane road entirely within a random small town, and it will stay empty and stupid. But, in the range of what actually might be built, yes, there’s pretty strong empirical evidence that cars fill any available space.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Which this actually isn’t a straight example of, exactly. Jevon’s paradox says more and better roads will mean more cars operating, not less. That happens, but in this case the increase is so great, that it leads to the same level of congestion on the roads all over again.

        The wiki uses the example of coal. Better boilers and engines increased the use of coal, but it’s fair to say industrial Europe had better coal powered equipment afterwards, not the same or worse. (Although, to be fair, congestion is only one metric of traffic performance)

        • phineas1134@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I agree, Jevon’s is not the perfect way to describe this affect. Is there a better way to classify this? It’s bugged me for a bit as I’ve had good debates about adding biking lanes and better sidewalks instead of just more lanes for cars. But Jevon’s is the best I could come up with.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            No, it’s relevant enough, thanks for bringing it up.

            You could say something about the elasticity of road usage being 1, but if you’re not a wonk that means nothing. Induced traffic is another technical term you might see around. Saying “research suggests another lane means an equal number of additional cars, eventually” is about what gets the best comprehension.

    • dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is definitely not always true. They added a lane in my city a few years ago and my commute went from 45 minutes to 30 minutes.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        IIRC the trend is observed over longer periods, where it feeds into people’s decisions about whether to have a car or second car, and how far to commute. And even then, congestion and travel time are two different things - an extra lane probably makes no difference, but a new route or higher speed limit will get you there faster regardless.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      this logic asssumes more road == population growth

      sure, and telescopes created all the stars in the sky.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        The number of car-hours per person per year isn’t even close to fixed over the long run. The trend is basically that in the past, people might have carpooled, taken a bus or even hitchhiked, and usually lived close to their job. If the roads get better, they drive more.

        • Smoogs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          so your idea is installing a system is pushing for classism and hoping to furthering socioeconomic downturn on the landscape of select neighbourhoods with select individuals with large populations that are struggling, paying the most taxes, yet expected to travel for lower wage jobs and you want to make their travel to work harder.

          how bigotted.

    • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 month ago

      DNS constantly has weird little issues and attacks, same with ARP. Meanwhile, BGP just keeps on chugging along in the background, ignored and unappreciated, day in and day out.

      • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Despite the many issues that it can cause, that is an important feature of BGP. Since network connections can be asymmetrical, and outbound and inbound connections can have different requirements, the best (or most adequate) route from A to B might not be the best route from B to A.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 month ago

    The longevity of concrete isn’t just tied to the cylinder break strength.

    Also, concrete with certain aggregates end up creating silica gel, which is bad for concrete.

  • Iconoclast@feddit.ukOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 month ago

    An example from my field of expertise: Mixing different kinds of metals in wet environments causes the less noble one to corrode.

  • PillowD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 month ago

    The asphalt pavement of roads must be 4 inches thick to last forever. 3 inches lasts 5 years, 2 inches lasts one year, 1 inch is crumbling before you finish. You constantly see crumbling roads in the third world because of corruption, they don’t put as much pavement down as they charge for.

  • dellish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The borders between countries in the Middle East including India/Pakistan were deliberately drawn to cause conflict. Of course when that conflict started to come back home everyone was shocked pikachu faced about it. I really don’t understand why people of those countries don’t just throw away the map and sort it out amongst themselves like adults, but I guess expecting world leaders of a majority of countries to act like adults is a bit much to ask most of the time.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      kashmere, and northern india/bordering china. one wants the whole terrority the other wants the same, a pretense to expand later on.

  • Sineljora@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Among many other reasons, the biggest reason for me that the US stock market cannot be trusted is because market makers combine 3 techniques to create fraud and push risk to others to dilute unwitting companies and investors: borrow stocks, selling a borrowed stock to buy later, strategically failing to deliver stock.

    Borrowing stocks doesn’t create a clean paper trail, can be done repeatedly, and steals shareholder votes.

    Selling a borrowed stock to buy later can strategically intend to fail from the start where they don’t even have to locate (not even acquire as you might assume) a share to borrow, effectively creating new shares out of thin air. Market makers in the US can legally do this, even for the benefit of their hedge fund counterparts (sometimes under the same company).

    Fails for stock delivery are allowed, so they’re a strategy. Cash in lieu is not the same as share ownership. Cash is fungible, stocks are not, and this gap can create technically infinite risk.

    • Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nah, the stock markets were fixed in 2008!

      They created dark pools.

      But in seriousness this unrealistic playground should be completely separated from real economics and fucks everything up.