From the article:

The plane’s fuel was tested and found to be of satisfactory quality,

-5. I had one parent that was not great, and one that was a doormat. It wasn’t any of the usual suspects, and I would say that that parent is eccentric and oblivious more than a bad person, but in the end I think I came out with some trauma.

School was really hard early on (because I’m also weird), while the parental issues grew more severe later on.

For the Republicans, it’s either this guy or a recently promoted conspiracy influencer with random frat bros as staff. The Democrats will still manage to lose.

(This is my impression as a Canadian)

I’d come and talk to you about it, but I’d need A Free Ride.

Well, I don’t really love that as a security philosophy. If it’s somehow not going on now it will be soon.

English orthography is pretty dumb, TBF.

I think I remember hearing that it would react with dark matter the same way.

Like matter, it doesn’t interact with dark matter to any detectable degree.

I say “doesn’t” on purpose, because we have small containers of the stuff tucked away in labs, and it’s (momentarily) created as an inevitable byproduct of particle accelerators and certain radioactive decays.

So my question is, does anti-dark matter exist, and what are it’s properties?

Nobody knows what dark matter is beyond it being everywhere and heavy, so double don’t-know. There’s no particular reason to think it would follow a similar pattern, though.

I don’t think anyone would call their religion a hobby, though.

I feel like it would be easier to list the hobbies that aren’t, based on the answers so far.

I mean, Buddhists just did a genocide in Myanmar. They have a cleaner track record than Abrahamic faiths for sure, but if you spend serious time in actual Buddhist places it fills the exact same societal roles.

Neopaganism is a bit of an odd one out in that list, because it’s a newly invented thing.

Friends and family will either listen to a point before saying they can’t handle it

Well, that’s good to hear. Hopefully it helps, and I’d also suggest that it means they do care, at least a bit.

Maybe they do need to give you more time to vent, it’s hard to say without being there. In general, we on the internet don’t know you and can’t have enough information to help you the way a therapist can.

The fact that oxygen may have shot up to modern levels really early on for a bit fascinates me in particular.

This is either bait, or you need to get the police involved for the kids and find somewhere safer/saner to live yourself.

We’d love to. You know we get it first and in higher concentration, right? Not to mention all our shit that burns down in the process.

And I mean, it’s from the climate change that you helped make as well…

If your water splitters are running, you should really just use the electricity they’re on to generate heat. Fire is especially dangerous in enclosed spaces.

Also for load balancing you could constantly be splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen, then react them back into water when you need a large amount of energy at once as an alternative to electrical batteries which degrades less over time, if heat is all you want at least.

Some kind of combustion with oxidiser built in might always have an application. Chemical rocket boosters maybe? (Hydrogen specifically can also be turned back into electricity with like 80% efficiency in a fuel cell, FYI, although it’s sooo hard to store)

I suppose there might be The Martian-esque edge cases as well, where more complex, controlled chemical reactions are temporarily impractical, but like in the book and movie that’s highly unsustainable and you’ll die if you’re stuck doing it for long.

You said turbines specifically. Parsons invented those around the turn of the 20th century.

Before that, it was the chugga-chugga kind of steam engine. They’re a lot simpler to design and machine, and don’t require the really high RPMs to operate, but then again can break in many different ways a turbine can’t.

Wow, that’s amazing. I’m guessing the then very-limited suffrage had to do with it. It would have been just white landowning males at the time, right?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_problems_in_loop_theory_and_quasigroup_theory

And I’m pretty sure a bunch of other pages related to loops and quasigroups. I don’t still have them open, though.

I mean, that’s 20th century, or (IIRC) just before depending on the level of tech maturity you require. The 19th century ran on pistons.

Burning random stuff for heat requires cheap, abundant oxygen, though.