• HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.eedeleted by creatorBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This isn’t difficult.

    He wasn’t under arrest from the first moment the police talked to him. That doesn’t mean he wasn’t at any subsequent point put under arrest.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So what is the specific action that legally defines when a suspect goes from “not under arrest” to “under arrest”? After all, there are specific rights and actions allowed under one but not the other. So how do the suspect and the police know and legally define when that change takes place?

      Could is possibly be… The reading of the Maranda Rights?

      • HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.eedeleted by creatorBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. Because the police don’t have to Mirandize someone when they arrest them.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So what is the specific action that legally defines when a suspect goes from “not under arrest” to “under arrest”?

          • HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.eedeleted by creatorBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The legal definition is when a reasonable person would no longer feel free to leave.