For those who missed it, Iran launched a missile attack on Israel, it appears to be over for now, but who knows how long?

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    So, Israel will retaliate for Iran retaliating against Israel’s actions that were retaliation for…

    • thejml@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s retaliations all the way down…

      Always has been.

      • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Israel has two realistic options

        • de escalate, don’t retaliate and watch them keep going.

        • escalate, retaliate, and give Iran the same two choices.

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          The difference being that Israel has been going for escalations much stronger, having attacked Lebanon far more often over the past year than Hezbollah had attacked them and ramping things up with more and more attacks including attacks onto Syria and Iran directly.

          Netanyahu needs the escalation to distract from the failure of achieving any strategic goal in Gaza and to drag the US into a war, so as to not finally draw a line to Israels actions.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          De-escalate, everything goes back to normal is looking pretty viable, actually. Or at least was a couple weeks ago. Israel is the only one that wants to have a regional war right now.

          That would mean Netanyahu goes to jail for corruption, though, and he doesn’t feel like it. And America doesn’t feel like stopping him.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I mean, there’s a bit more nuance to it. The Middle East has changed dramatically several times in the last century. If you put it that way you make it sound like the Crusades are still going, which is not historically accurate.

        The jist that everyone’s memory selectively extends back to the last time they were wronged is correct, though.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      And continue the chain back 70 to (less credibly) 3000 years. Welcome to the Middle East.

      If it were anywhere else, the world would insist everyone to calm the hell down and negotiate, but the white guys vaguely in the Bible are involved here, and America has feelings about that.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s been their tactic this whole time. Threats and retaliation against the defending nation. I believe this is the third time.with Iran now?

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      When a “news” outlet uses this kind of propaganda, it demonstrates just how useless the imperial news is. And it’s always been this way.