• Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      see i clocked this immediately, because it’s too perfect, it’s too engaging. That’s how you have to approach it at this point, you can’t really scrutinize the details any more, all that’s left is just pure context…

      Why would this scenario happen? Why would there be a sign just saying “Panda” without anything else? Why would the cat conveniently sit right under it?
      Yeah sure this could actually happen, but it’s really unlikely.

    • mamg22@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      Damn, can’t enjoy shit on the internet anymore, now I’ve gotta wonder if it’s just fake slop before even laughing at it

    • Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      9 days ago

      Maybe it is, but its ironic youre using an LLM to detect it. Plus, theyre known for being wrong constantly, you cannot trust it to accurately tell you if it was AI or not. Flipping a coin has almost the same odds

      • nialv7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        9 days ago

        i am not using an llm to detect it. computerphile has a good video explaining how it works.

        shocking people can be so confidently wrong about things they don’t know well.

      • redjard@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        Screenshot doesn’t show forther down, where it says it has a synthid watermark. Which makes use of the llm that made it, but is itself a regular deterministic cryptographic procedure.