• chunk6235@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nah, this is just basic biological racism. It wouldn’t be phrenology until they were making arguments that the shape or the lumps on his head made him stupid/insane/an insatiable raping machine/some other dumb bullshit.

      Somehow, biological racism isn’t nearly as stupid as phrenology.

      • DokPsy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        No, it is just as stupid, racist, and grounded in as much verifiable science but this is a rectangle/square conversation. Phrenology is a subsect of biological racism.

    • Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zipBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I hate phrenology, for the obvious reasons, but also because it makes people scared to death to discuss any kind of bone structure differences between regional groups.

      I remember when Elizabeth Warren was getting flack for lying about being part Native American. The “high cheekbones” comment got a lot of derision, despite being a fairly tame comment outside of the lying.

      Not saying it’s useful in a biological sense, just in colloquial speak.

      • bufalo1973@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The problem with phrenology is linking bone structure with behavior. But it’s stupid not discussing bone structure for a pseudoscience.