It gets my goat that people think it’s a good option. There are plenty of articles explaining some of the many issues with it, but a few are:

  1. It’s run by anti-LGBTQ+ crypto bros.
  2. It has ads right out of the box.
  3. It collected donations towards people who never signed up for them - then held them to ransom in exchange for the kind of information you should never share on the Internet.
  4. They’re a for-profit advertising company. “Privacy-centric” my elbow.
  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Also, the Brave defenders in this section… holy moly.

    Some folks simply cannot admit they made a questionable choice. They picked it and use it, so everyone else must be wrong.

    I’ve met people like this in real life.

  • ReluctantlyZen@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you absolutely need a Chromium browser (if you’re a privacy advocate, I don’t understand why. Using a Chromium browser means Google can do whatever they want with web standards), use Vivaldi or something.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s because no-one knows any alternatives.

    If one wants a Chrome-based browser that isn’t Chrome, Brave is the highest-profile one by orders of magnitude. Next is a bunch of high-SEO scamware before honest projects like Vivaldi or Helium are even a whisper.


    …So I don’t really blame folks for using Brave. They aren’t omniscient, and an honest effort to avoid Chrome is still a positive.

  • Cekan14@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    I use Firefox. I know it’s not perfect, but it’s not that bad.

    And if I didn’t, I’d use Vivaldi. Only reason I don’t is I do prefer open source whenever possible and, well, Firefox isn’t Chromium.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        But it kills the battery on mobile, even scrolling it choppy.

        I switched to the Samsung browser a few years ago, I don’t know what black magic they do but it’s super smooth and light on the battery. It has some plugin support but I don’t use it so can’t comment much about it. It’s chromium based.

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            This is one from 2 days ago…

            PS: it’s not some accounting trickery, if I load a few reddit comment threads to read on a plane the battery really lasts forever.

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Yeah, that’s my point. 40m on screen 8.4% if battery.

            I didn’t use it that much yesterday, but we can extrapolate…

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          What phone were you using?

          I I’ve never had any issue with firefox, with regards to battery or scrolling, but i use 8 year old flagship (Got it used, I’m not Mr.Moneybags)… which is probably still better than a budget phone of today, though.

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Relatively new Samsung S24 Ultra, similar as you: “old” flagship bought used. The scrolling on the Samsung browser is like an iPhone, with Firefox like a windows 95 :(

            Happened with a previous Samsung as well. On my old oneplus everything was kinda choppy.

            • Bilb!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              On my Z Fold 6, I do notice that Samsung Internet, Chrome, etc are smoother, that is absolutely true. It’s not really enough to matter to me, though, doesn’t really warrant being described as “choppy” in my experience. My default is IronFox with uBlock Origin.

            • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Well, Samsung is enshitified with its newer phones, that I have no doubt that an S24 would run non-samsung shit poorly to force you to use samsung shit.

              • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Samsung was enshittified with their older phones too.

                Pixels are shit too.

                I had a One Plus 9 Pro and it was honestly my first phone that I traded in and felt like I got a huge downgrade. It just worked.

              • Tja@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                I doubt it’s on purpose, many other non-Samsung apps run fine, even when a samsung alternative exists, it’s specifically the browser that is weird. Which is a pity, since I do use Firefox on my desktop and laptop, but the mobile experience is just frustrating.

                • VAK@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I have an s24 and had the same experience. Fennec F-droid worked better for me.

    • FG_3479@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      LibreWilf is a good choice if you don’t want the Mozilla crap. Just make sure to turn off the cookie clearing and resistFingerprinting then enable WebGL in the browser’s settings.

  • Mikina@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    257
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s a for profit ad company making a “privacy first browser”.

    Thinking for literaly a second about that sentence should tell you all you need to know.

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      it’s the best browser out there right now. did you know it has the TOR net and ad blocking built in? great huh?

      where does firefox make its money

      IS IT FROM GOOGLE SEARCHES?

      so what have the owners done to the lgbtq+ community in the last 5 years?

      • MrKoyun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Customized firefox, zen browser, helium, and mullvad all with some kind of assortment of privacy extentions.

        On Android, we got ironfox and cromite. most of the same privacy extentions are applicable.

        If you want to use the tor network, go use the tor browser.

        Frankly, I do not care that much that Mozilla makes most of its money from Google. I can change the search engine as the first thing I do and this fact simply stops affecting my experience negatively, especially on Firefox derivates.

    • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      you can do privacy friendly ads, it’s not because the entire industry has evolved to an horrible point that the good way of doing it can’t exist

  • Luminous5481 "Lawless Heathen" [they/them]@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    They’re a for-profit advertising company. “Privacy-centric” my elbow.

    a for-profit company partially funded by the billionaire Peter Thiel, of Palantir fame. the same Palantir spying on Americans in order to allow nazis to round up immigrants and throw them into concentration camps. the same Peter Thiel that said democracy is not compatible with freedom.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 days ago

      The same one who wants to create the apocalypse and believes the anti-Christ is anyone who isn’t fascistic

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    3 days ago

    They added referrals to links you clicked. If there is one thing a browser should do its go to the link you click without modification.

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      As far as I remember, there is some browser with a feature of stripping tracking id from the URL, that is modification, but I find it good (if I can opt in, and if the feature is visible enough to know what to try if it doesn’t work)

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        And you chose to do that or it was a feature that was advertised to you. Adding referral IDs to links you click so the browser company gets money is not comparable to that at all.

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Mind you, I’m not arguing that was crappy, just that not any modification of links is bad

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I would argue that if you know your browser is stripping tracking info for links then the link you clicked on doesn’t have tracking information.

  • LaoiseFu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I had no idea about any of this. Have been using brave on android for a few weeks and very happy with it. What would you recommend instead?

  • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yeah it kinda mystifies me that anyone is still recommending that shitty bigotware.

    In the emulation scene, RetroArch is in a similar boat if I’m understanding things correctly. Awful maintainers, but people keep recommending it and supporting it. Sucks too, because there are even fewer alternatives there.

      • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        This website details various issues. I’d suggest looking at the Byuu page - as I understand it the RetroArch devs played a large role in the harrassments that were being done to the developer of Higan/bsnes, which eventually led to them killing themself.

        • Liketearsinrain@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Did I miss what you’re talking about? It just mentions Xbox SDKs being proprietary, which I couldn’t care less about. Apologies if I missed what you mentioned

          • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            This is the page I’m referring to, where one of the main RA devs is shown saying a lot of really toxic things about byuu. It’s kind of hard to find any reliable info about the dramas, but there are various threads online where people bring up a number of dramas, like this thread.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I used retro arch a decade ago, and when setting up a emulation pi last year the consensus seemed to be batocera. No idea if its better, but it’s as easy to use as I remembered and my kids are still enjoying it, so not too unstable.

      • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Batocera is a relatively minimalist Linux distro for emulation specifically. It’s one example that kind of highlights the problem I’m referring to. All of these retro software stacks still use RetroArch to varying degrees, and depend on it. Even alternative frontends like Emulation Station are just built on top of the same libraries. Or as another example, for most game systems, RetroAchievements only currently work on RetroArch.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        My only issue with batocera is that GameCube was broken out of the box and I haven’t had the time to figure out how to fix it

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 days ago

      Basically the thing that turned the internet against Honey, but when a homophobic piece of shit does it it’s fine

      • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Honey swapped the referal code when another reflink was clicked, brave only applied it’s own code when no referral was used. Not saying that it’s good but honey was purposefully robbing creators, often their own partners when brave only tried to make some money on the side.

  • hemmetti@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Brave is just a shitty browser. Did not know they were anti-freedom kind of people. Makes browser no-no.