• Zoabrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Geordi’s visor can see all ends of the electromagnetic spectrum, but even he can’t find the source of some Fediverse arguments. It really is farm-to-table rage here. 😂

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I went and scrolled facebook recently and it is absolutely crazy. You get some ads, sure, and a few things that real people posted, but like half of what is on there feels like some kind of shady psychological experiment.

    It’s like a whole spectrum of flavors of ultra-processed engagement bait. Much of it is made to look like normal people posting normal things, just with a “follow” next to the name and 5,000 replies from kind old people trapped in a rabbit hole they don’t even know exists.

    • Iced Raktajino@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I can’t even fathom what contemporary Facebook is like. I deleted it in, I think, 2009 or thereabouts, right after they changed the timeline from reverse chronological to whatever their first iteration of the engagement-based one is. I thought that sucked pretty bad, so, yeah, can’t even imagine how bad it is today.

  • Rimu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Even if fedi was pure and perfect, it still exists within a wider ecosystem of algo-driven rage and it’s influence leaks in from every side. It’s not just that we don’t exclusively get our news from the fedi it’s that news articles themselves are optimized for rage, the writers are deeply under it’s spell, politician’s media strategy is optimized for it.

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      And we’re all socialized by corporate platforms to engage with eachother in a way that prioritizes engagement, which we bring with us when we come to the fediverse

    • Iced Raktajino@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      20 hours ago

      True, there’s definitely that. I guess I just wish there was more thought between that and “do I really need to post this?”

    • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Algorithms give you what you want. If you’re getting rage, you’re looking at and upvoting rage. On Reddit, 99% of what I get are posts about Hitman, Blender, Boomershooters and other things I’m interested in. The same with YT except I also get obscure movies from the 30s and 40s. The more of that I consume, the more the algorithms push it to me. The same with news. If there’s a big news event I might read and watch a bunch of news and then all the news stuff gets pushed to me.

      Algorithms boil down to “Did user look at, upvote something with these keywords? If yes, then send more things with those keywords their way.” These magical mystery algorithms are probably 5 lines of code most.

      • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Not on YouTube. I only watch instructional videos and how-to fix videos.

        But it doesn’t stop YouTube from oddly recommending a right wing grifter or influencer shit with that stupid ass shock face.

        • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You looked at one of those videos at some point. I get them too because I occasionally get curious. Some of it is tied to watch history. You might have one buried in the pile. If you clean it out, you might not see those anymore.

      • Njos2SQEZtPVRhH@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yes, it gives you what you respond to, it steers towards engagement. So it provides content which has a strong emotional response because the strong emotions drive us to engage. Anger and resentment are very strong driving powers here. I don’t doubt that what you’re saying about how the things you engage with, and how you steer the algorithm or the algorith steers you. But that doesn’t disprove the fact that algorithms are generally making our debates more angry, it would just suggest that you are less vulnerable to this.

        • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          What would disprove it is if people would quit upvoting, reading, and watching things that make them more and more angry. Algorithms don’t steer anyone. People steer themselves with the algorithms. They’re essentially mirrors of one’s personality. Just be aware if you upvote a post that says “Tech billionaire kills baby seals with his bare hands, has sex with the corpses, and laughs about it on TikTok”, you’re going to get more stuff that has all those keywords in it. However, if you upvote “How do I subdivide a mesh in Blender?” you will get a bunch of stuff about Blender, subdividing 3D models, and other topics related to that.

    • idunnololz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It certainly could be true but ever since I started blocking news on sight and read my local newspaper only, I have not seen nearly as much rage bait content.

      That being said it is kind of annoying that every time I block a community posting news another one pops up :/

  • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Outside of the ethical considerations, I’m not militant about the organic label. But I stopped by this little health food store in a tiny town (think ~1k pop.) in a very red state, and she told me that I would never buy brussel sprouts from anywhere else after trying her’s. I was dubious at first, but I just cooked them a few hours ago, and she was absolutely correct! Best sprouts I’ve ever had!

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    less free range than you’d think. I would say at least 30% of content on the fediverse is bot originated. 5-16% of commentary is AI generated.

    • [deleted]@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It is fairly easy to accept that it is just amplifying human nature. The main issue is that with the major locked down aggregators the amplification is intentional and continuously changed to increase the amplification by doing things like stuffing divisive posts into feeds.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      because it amplifies flaws in human nature.

      It might be amplifying already existing traits, but that doesn’t excuse it. It’s still damaging to society at large

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        A huge chunk of humanity is currently tripping up over the “is fascism bad?” question. There’s no fucking way we’re tackling the subtle influence of internet algorithms.

        On the bright side, if we do ever get around to the topic there will probably be a lot fewer opinions to contend with.

  • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I mean things like GIFT are always going to be with us but this feels like the normal level of being angry at idiots on the internet versus turbo corpo enshittification