I’m going to start running these slopware projects through my own AI and open 6000 PRs for “fixes”.

3000 years in the future archeological digs will find it and believe it was used for some special ritual.

you should rub your dick all over it, as a joke. it’ll be hilarious in 3000 years dude.

I have found docker hates locally mounted NFS mounts direct to volume mounts. its kind of like symlinking a symlink of a symlink.

best way I have found that this works is to use CIFS and declare a NAS share to an actual docker volume and then mount that inside the container like any other volume.

personally I would have preferred NFS, but here we are.

it has something to do with how NFS connectivity maintains a connection. it’s not “always on” but is inefficient when it quickly needs to reconnect for a read/write request. or at least something like that.

F/15/Cali

entire fist inside me

he only said I was a dumb bitch and hit me because I told him I didn’t vote for Trump. he’s not like this all the time.

when people tell you who they are, listen.

man, that’s a whole lot of fantasy wrapped up around a tool that’s propping up fascist oligarchs that are driving the world into a forced plutocracy where we’re all enslaved to work for “the company”.

It makes me hesitant to believe I’m on the “correct side” …

full stop.

you seem to have a misconception here. there isn’t a right and wrong side. there’s opinions and positions you agree and disagree with. from there, you can have factually correct opinions and opinions based entirely on fantasy.

only you can decide what is right vs wrong from your own positions. if you think an opinion is wrong on here, point it out. argue your position. ignore the upvotes and downvotes because they’re gamed anyway.

I may not agree with you on any of your opinions, but that doesn’t mean you don’t have a right to express them (no matter how dumb they are).

just don’t be afraid to have your opinions and preconceptions challenged.

AI is fascism. it’s a tool being employed to circumvent democracy and attack our personal freedoms.

no AI company is in existence that isn’t desperately attempting to enslave us all.

I will never “live with it”. much the same way I’ll never “live with” rapists or child molesters.

minority or not. I’m not going to make excuses to just “join in” when there’s heavy implications of licensing violations and poor ethical practices surrounding the implementation of slopware.

I’ll never use AI in the development of a project because it goes against every single principal that drives me. AI is my arch enemy, the antithesis of my whole being.

no, never.

AI is fascism. it all supports fascist companies that wish for nothing more than to enslave you.

why anyone would want to support the thing that wants you enslaved or dead is beyond me.

However I feel like this will soon be rendered useless as all projects will move to agentic (or otherwise ai-assisted) coding.

mine won’t. ever.

Resources are already tight for most projects, and rejecting productivity in favor of aesthetics is a rich guy’s strategy.

you’re overlooking principles. I’ll trade “productivity” for my morals every time.

I know I’m not the only dev to feel like this.

you can’t do that to a CEO. you can’t just unilaterally apply the law to them!

I mean, they’re rich! think of all the money they could generate for shareholders!

dude, I knew an old German woman who immigrated after WW2 to the US.

she straight up started yelling at the Mexicans speaking Spanish that it’s disrespectful to not speak English in the US.

it’s not just Americans doing it…

modern movies suck today because Hollywood stopped telling stories and started selling fantasies.

take for example two movies that are somewhat similar, Falling Down (1993) and Law Abiding Citizen (2009).

In FD the audience spends 75% of the movie following a guy around who is clearly not well. he’s the antihero that we all sometimes wish we could be, but we also acknowledge it’s moralistically unjust to just go around blowing shit up and shooting at people. towards the end of the movie you understand the real cause of why he was acting the way he was which made his character even more relatable. it made you question our society and the cruel realities that everyday people survive. it makes you think that maybe that “pocket protecting pencil pusher” has more in common with you than you’d like to admit.

In LAC the audience is immediately jarred by a violent sexual event that charges you with a desire for revenge. The rest of the movie is about a guy taking that revenge and getting some sadistic pleasure from it. you aren’t supposed to relate to the main character, or any character in the entire movie. everyone is shitty except for his dead wife and kid. The premise of the entire movie is to make the audience feel good that “justice” is being administered and sugar coats it in a high fructose action syrup. by the end of the movie you’re filled with rage of the injustices within our own world and feel as if you have been wronged like the main character. you spend the rest of the night imagining your own revenge if you were the main character.

FD tells the story of how far a broken man will go if he has everything taken from him.

LAC sells the fantasy that revenge is action packed and you will always win if your cause is righteous and just.

that said, don’t get me wrong. I liked both movies, but I’m not going to lie to myself and say that LAC isn’t just revenge porn.

modern movies are flat and simple because audiences lack the mental capacity they used to have. this is because we no longer watch them for entertainment, we watch to escape our own realities.

edit: oh yeah and sound engineers can suck fucking dick if they can’t understand how to level out the foreground, background, and vocals for a regular not action movie. I’m tired of reading subtitles.

hold up. let’s ignore the fact that you have an IUD, and that you were both clean.

any sexual partner that throws shade about wearing a condom should be put on an automatic “no-fuck” list. the only exception to this is if you have been regularly raw-dogging without complaint.

point is, your partner was trying to compel you to remove safe sex protections that you were comfortable with. this isn’t the first time they have done this with a partner and implies they have unprotected sex regularly.

you got lucky, this time. if safe sex is important to you, you need to set those ground rules and not allow your partners to dissuade you, because one day you will regret it.

the next time this happens and they try to guilt you into fucking them raw just tell them, “I guess it’s alright, I don’t have any condoms small enough to fit you.” I can guarantee the mood will be dead and you won’t have to tell them to wear a condom again.

this reeks of “so much for the tolerant left”.

Ideas are challenged, there’s no dogmas here.

and yeah, if your position is “what’s happening in the world today isn’t a fascist coup lead by conservative christian nationalists”, then you are my enemy.

just because I’m tolerant of others opinions doesn’t mean I have to unilaterally respect all positions.

I think you underestimate the intelligence services that are dedicated to his safety.

they would see plans of a nuke months before they would see some psycho with a gun that decides on a whim that “today’s the day”.

what’s funny is that there’s more similarities to the Korean war and what’s happening in Iran than you might expect.

here’s the thing about narcissists. they only care about themselves. not stuff, not people, not morals or ethics or laws or anything.

as long as he’s alive, that’s all he cares about.

the only way to truly scare a narcissist is to take the most important thing from them of all.

public attention.

tor is actually a bit more secure than i2p from my understanding. mostly it has to do with the routing, which is both the strength and weakness of tor.