• tenchiken@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    Me, who has learned where the ladyparts lay, enjoys taking time to get to know them and typically doesn’t need mechanical assistance due to sufficient preamble.

  • thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    i’m cut and have no idea what this meme is about. growing up, i thought all dicks just looked like mine, i only found out about what a dick is supposed to look like the first time i watched porn…

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        With a strong enough erection (such as when having sex, aka what you’d see in porn) cut and uncut look the same. The difference only shows itself with a semi or when soft

          • Rakonat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            If the foreskin pulls back like it should, they are similar enough most people wouldn’t notice the difference at a glance. If the foreskin is getting caught or not pulling back it’s potentially a sign of various conditions that can be harmful if ignored

            • SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Potentially. But you can have a perfectly healthy dick even if it doesn’t pull back fully when erect. As long as it can happen when flaccid so you can clean it properly it usually shouldn’t be an issue.

    • Floodedwomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      As a gay man, and a slut, i think I have an opinion that matters here. I don’t believe that they can be compared directly. Some cut ones are cut way far back and seem to cause pain, while others are crazy long and look like a weird sea creature. I have never noticed a large difference in cleanliness or sensitivity. They do taste different.

  • TerranFenrir@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’d honestly love to see a world war between circumcised and uncircumcised folks. I wonder who would win.

    • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Uncircumcised is the default and probably has a numerical advantage, but once you get circumcised, you can’t go back. The circumcised can always convert people, and there’s nothing the uncircumcised can do to stop their POWs from being forced to switched sides.

      However, what about everyone who doesn’t have a penis? Would their allegiance lie with the uncircumcised? Would people who’ve experienced genital mutilation join the circumcised? Who would formerly circumcised people who now don’t have penises join? Would bottom surgery make someone automatically join team circumcision?

      This whole thought experiment begs many questions.

      • SpoonyBard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I think we would see an additional category. People that were circumcised against their will, wanting to go back to the side they may have loyalty for. Someone who was passionate that the uncircumcised side was the only side to be on, the righteous side, but was forced into circumcision.

        I think they try to sew back on the foreskin. The thought may begin with some being ashamed that they lost their foreskin and had to “replace it”, but it may quickly become a thing of “who is going to know?”.

        Problem is… someone would come up with a way to tell. And the “true foreskiners” do not accept the “sewed on foreskiners”. There is bigotry and divided among their side. Causing an inner struggle and broken down factions of the same side. Some “sewed on foreskiners” may feel that the “true foreskiners” aren’t the side they used to be and won’t accept them anyways, so they removed the replaced foreskin to either join the circumcised or possibly start their own, new side. “The circumcised reborners”

      • Meron35@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        This overlooks female circumcision (it is as terrifying and horrifying as it sounds)

    • Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 days ago

      Old enough to have no choice in the matter. We should be pissed at the church, backward medicine and our parents, not each other.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Obviously the circumcised. They would easily convert the captures enemy soldiers to their side but the uncircumcised would not be able to do it.