The net harm to the environment is lower because of them.
The net harm to the environment is lower because of them.
No subsidies for anything actively harming the environment.
*easy to take down regions with technologically outdated and divided populations who’ve already been weakened by internal strife.
This paints more of a gray picture.
once linux is more common, that will change for the worse
Up in the air was ahead of its time
Always seemed kinda dumb to rear animals on agriculture. Why not cut out the middleman and eat the crops directly?
I installed nixos on my laptop. That was four weeks ago. I am still configuring it.
How much rust in there?
deleted by creator
Eh, so long as they do it right
If you see me going the extra mile, it’s probably the side-effects of me using the company’s resources to learn and do crazy experiments for my own gain.
How does that work? Is the fetus transplanted into the second mother halfway through the pregnancy? Seems needlessly complicated.
Good luck, and make sure to use version control!
NixOS superiority.
When there aren’t enough linux girls, the common GNUtaku undergoes a convoluted transformation to fill the pussy vacuum.
Such is the way of FOSS.
Unless the number of GNU/Linux maintainers also matches the growing userbase, we’re heading towards a world of pain.
Devs overrun by unhelpful bug reports, scammers and malware abound, forums stretched beyond capacity by the exact same queries.
If PC Linux can be monetized, it will be.
Quality shit
With the general state of health in America, it’s probably better for the fit 0.1% if they don’t have to share healthcare resources with the rest.