• DreamButt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s always weird to me that people associate Dictatorial Command Economies with Communism. On one hand they like to label themselves as communist but on the other hand y’all really gotta learn to read between the lines. It’s like saying socialism has failed buecase the Nazi’s had socialism in their name.

      • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is just the No True Scotsman argument. Every communist nation has always insisted that the dictatorship is a necessary transitional state so that true communism could be achieved, and been run by parties espousing the need to achieve that communism. Those dictatorships have never truly moved towards that.

        Either communism is impossible or communism is dictatorship. You can pick either one, but there’s not another option.

        • PorkRollWobbly@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Negative, the Nazis came for trade unionists first. Quite the opposite of what a socialist party would do.

          • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            While the bolshevists coopted the unions and turned them into agents of the Party, corrupting them from representative bodies into people spying on the working class for disloyalty

            • PorkRollWobbly@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Buddy, I’m an Anarchist, I don’t praise the Bolshevists. I have my critiques of them too but I’m not gonna sit here and say the Nazis were Socialists because they have “socialist” in their name. “Baby oil” doesn’t actually have babies in it.

              • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Then I can’t argue against you, because it’s impossible to argue against hypothetical utopianism.

        • DreamButt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I couldn’t disagree more. How about we stop trying to run dictatorships all together? No one says we need to flip a light switch and suddenly make the world communist. But there are plenty of communist ideals we can try on under democratic systems. Really easy ones that come to mind are forcing companies to give all employees ownership and/or profit sharing. The world isn’t black and white and history isn’t an example of every possible path forward

    • Lordbaum@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      3 examoles i could give for socialism two of them where crushed by the Soviet Union. Revolutionary Spain and the free territory of Ukraine. One which works since 10 years (while trying not to get crushed by Turkey and IS) and there are some more such free territories which therefore also democratized thier economics. Also fuck tankies btw

    • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh, you’re a communist? Name every communism.

      If you want a list of currently ongoing socialist and anarchist communities with de facto territorial sovereignty, the list goes

      Rojava

      The Zapatistas

      If you want a list of all past socialist territories, the list is too long but the highlights are South Yemen and Anarchosyndicalist Catalonia

  • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Many different types of communism though, looking at countries with communist pasts.

    Unions were started by them, not by liberals and the like.

    Compared to today, unions are not that radical. More strikes are coming but both dems and reds stop them.

    Looking at Biden breaking the rail road strike.

    I think communists would be for gun rights and much more libertarian left polices, to a certain point.

    The first international efforts at organizing workers were established by Marx himself. Marx led the International Working Men’s Association (IWA), which was a coalition founded by union leaders in 1864, aimed at uniting various leftist groups, including socialists, communists, and anarchists, to join in the common goal of defeating capitalism.

    In 1872, the IWA focused its efforts on the United States, moving its headquarters to New York City. After it disbanded in 1876, the Workingmen’s Party of the United States (WPUS) was founded in its place. The WPUS organized railroad workers in the Great Railroad Strike of 1877, which started in West Virginia and spread across several states, leading to deadly riots. Over one hundred people were killed as a result, and in Philadelphia, rioters burned down 39 buildings and dozens of trains, as well as over 1,200 freight cars.

    Unionization continued along Marxist lines, as did the violence. In 1886, after a confrontation between striking employees, strikebreakers, and police, a group of labor radicals (including anarchists and communists) held a rally in Chicago, now referred to as the Haymarket Riot. When one of the speakers at the rally shouted “Exterminate the capitalists!” police intervened, and things became violent. One rioter threw a stick of dynamite at police and shooting broke out; seven police officers and at least one civilian died.

    As Weingarten noted in a recent interview, “80% of parents, most parents, want teachers to teach honest history.” That’s exactly what should be taught—honest history. Kids should know about the historical accomplishments of organized labor, and how employees came together to improve their workplaces. They should also know that unionization in America was driven by revolutionary Marxist organizations, and that unions often instigated and participated in rioting and violence.

    https://americansforfairtreatment.org/2022/03/28/the-real-history-of-unions-violent-communist-agitation/

    • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unions may have started from the socialist movement, but insisting they’re communist in nature is just denying reality. Social liberalism also split from democratic socialism, and is an explicitly capitalist ideology. Genetic arguments are almost always shit, and I challenge you to walk up to the average union worker and ask them if they’re a communist.

      • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Communist movement, I do not think it was a socialist movement.

        I think most or all of them were not communist, just the leadership or the organizer that gets them together.

        Communists were a part of union culture since the bigging, the Red Scare removed most of them, then the unions became less effective.

        This is to the best of my knowledge.

        • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unions became less effective when union rights were attacked by Republicans, manufacturing declined in relative employment, and workers were more exposed to international competition.

    • UnverifiedAPK@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Communism is to a co-op what socialism is to a guild of freelancers.

      Socialism has the government control the main industrial output but you’re free to do and own your own stuff outside of that. Ideally the government controlled sector’s profits would be used to benefit the people again (free healthcare, etc)

      Oddly the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) is the best modern example of socialism.

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Where’s the part about calling for blanket genocide of people based on locality at birth?

  • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Out of all the times communism has been attempted, please point me to an example of a stable communist nation which promotes freedom for the working class.

  • socsa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Liberals: What if we tried the communism, but without the dictatorship phase?

    Marxist-Leninist: Look, we both known I’m just here for the fan service.

    Haha did I say liberals? I meant Jacobin. And the literal fucking Internationale. Y’all don’t even realize how out of touch you are.