slothrop @lemmy.ca to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agorapist rulelemmy.caimagemessage-square214linkfedilinkarrow-up11.29Karrow-down138file-text
arrow-up11.25Karrow-down1imagerapist rulelemmy.caslothrop @lemmy.ca to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square214linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarevelma@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down4·1 day agoWhat we were wearing at the time of our attack was not an invitation for violence.
minus-squareNotAnOtter@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·1 day agoDo you think the lesson in that metaphor is that I think women should be wearing helmets…? It’s not meant literally.
minus-squarevelma@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down4·1 day agoIt’s not my fault you can’t connect the dots here. You’re still blaming victims for not wearing helmets when they’re hit by the driver instead of placing the blame on the driver for hitting the cyclist.
minus-squareNotAnOtter@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·1 day agoThis isn’t productive so I’m going to stop responding to your bad faith bait. Try rereading the metaphor. Because I directly addressed who’s at fault.
minus-squarevelma@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 day ago But you should still wear a helmet
What we were wearing at the time of our attack was not an invitation for violence.
Do you think the lesson in that metaphor is that I think women should be wearing helmets…?
It’s not meant literally.
It’s not my fault you can’t connect the dots here.
You’re still blaming victims for not wearing helmets when they’re hit by the driver instead of placing the blame on the driver for hitting the cyclist.
This isn’t productive so I’m going to stop responding to your bad faith bait.
Try rereading the metaphor. Because I directly addressed who’s at fault.