fyi: it’s “drugs”

  • Setiyeti93@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    It’s so strange to me that the argument of she was drunk and / or on drugs so strange.

    These are reasons that she could never consent. Therefore any sexual act with her would be assault

    It feels so weird to me that they think this is some kind of “gotcha”.

    • Lithops@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      Its the typical shaming. The attempt to blame the victim. Always so wrong but seems for a lot of people legit.

    • deltapi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Does it make more sense if it’s presented as

      If a woman goes to a party, she won’t be raped unless there’s a rapist there.
      This holds true even if she’s on drugs and naked.

      Because the drugs aren’t the point