not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agorulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square61linkfedilinkarrow-up1826arrow-down111
arrow-up1815arrow-down1imagerulelemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square61linkfedilink
minus-squarePlayfulWitch@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 month ago On your last paragraph, I know. Rowling is a Nat-Z as well. That’s why I found it extremely unlikely that she’s a Holocaust denier What do you mean by this? Aren’t most Nazis denying the Holocaust? and why I used a Jewish supremacist source as they would never let that slide. I’d argue the opposite. Supremacists of any kind don’t care about facts and only care about “their side”
minus-squaredreamy (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zonedeleted by creatorBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 month agoNat-Z stands for National Zionist. And I’m not a Jewish supremacist. What I meant by that was that any kind of rhetoric that would harm the Zio victim narrative in any way would get a huge hit piece from them, not defense.
minus-squarechaogomu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoThe Zionist narrative has always downplayed or erased non-jewish holocaust victims.
minus-squaredreamy (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zonedeleted by creatorBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoI know. I don’t do that?
What do you mean by this? Aren’t most Nazis denying the Holocaust?
I’d argue the opposite. Supremacists of any kind don’t care about facts and only care about “their side”
Nat-Z stands for National Zionist. And I’m not a Jewish supremacist.
What I meant by that was that any kind of rhetoric that would harm the Zio victim narrative in any way would get a huge hit piece from them, not defense.
The Zionist narrative has always downplayed or erased non-jewish holocaust victims.
I know. I don’t do that?