• tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Supreme court has ruled that warrantless phone search at the border is bogus, but theyre too shitpantsed to stick with it

  • Sir G'kar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    3 months ago

    Seems like what’s needed is the ability to load an alternate profile or some kind of demo mode based on the pin. Something that looks normal but doesn’t have any info you don’t want others to see, without actually deleting anything.

    • Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      3 months ago

      I had this feature on a Xiaomi phone that i had a few years ago. I could even set up the fingerprint reader to open a different profile depending on which finger i used.

    • WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Alternately, a user profile that isn’t displayed anywhere, but accessible only through a specific PIN, maybe. Not sure how you’d explain the storage space either option used, however.

      • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 months ago

        It should work like truecrypt used to where there’s no sign some of the encrypted blob is not actually visible in the fake os.

        • Carl@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think the point is that if you load an empty profile (no photos, no videos, no apps, etc) but your phone storage is nearly full, it could throw up a red flag.

          • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s why the fake profile would not show that the storage is full. Unless they try to load lots of data onto the fake profile it would not be obvious.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nothing is needed. Erase your shit before you travel in or out of the US.

    • OrganicMustard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      You can already have multiple independent users in graphene (maybe in stock android too idk). You have to switch them before the possible search though.

  • shadowtofu@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    You have to carry a piece of paper in your wallet that contains a PIN. The piece of paper contains no further information, just a PIN. You decline to answer any questions regarding this piece of paper or your phone’s PIN.

    This might not be a good idea, depending on your jurisdiction.

    • Dæmon S.@catodon.rocks
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m not going to disclose my specific way, but numbers don’t need decimal digits to be expressed and parsed. An hypothetical example:

      Oh… ye shadow! Nahamah, my Mother

      Believe it or not, this is encoding the today’s date, 2026-07-26.

      Oh = 2 letters
      Elipsis = no letters, so 0
      ye = 2 letters
      shadow = 6 letters

      Nahamah = 7

      My = 2
      Mother = 6

      The funny part? I just conjured this technique during the composition of this very reply. It’s somehow easy for me to conjure atypical steganographic techniques, and I use steganography quite often IRL. In this way, I can literally write down my passwords and keep in my wallet, and absolutely nobody will get to figure out it’s meant to be a password.

      Luckily for FBI and other investigation agencies, I dont even think of visiting the USA, but good luck for any fed or cop trying to keep up with my plethora of steganographic techniques (and my neurodivergent brain) amidst plausible deniability if I ever did. Lol

      !privacy@lemmy.ml

    • Melobol@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      You can have a business card with a "phone"number on it. (Your pin can be any part of that number it is only you who needs to know where to start reading the code). You don’t need to have a sus number only piece of paper. :)

      • vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        3 months ago

        The point is that the cops would find and enter the pin.

        It’s the wipe pin.

        They wiped it, not you.

  • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is yesterday’s news. Destroying evidence is a crime in a lot of jurisdictions. With that in mind, I don’t understand how somebody who apparently uses Graphene OS didn’t bring an empty burner when crossing one of the most notorious borders in the world.

    Which isn’t to say that the laws that require you to unlock your phone and that throw you in jail if you securely wipe it aren’t hostile and inhumane.

  • SupremeDonut@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 months ago

    If the phone’s security prevents them from accessing information, then they have no information. How can they prove there was any information on it to begin with?

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    BS. It’s a claim from last year and not only in Spain, that criminals often use encrypted phomes (logical), among others, Graphene OS, but also iOS and Android. Not that all who use encrypted devices (or message apps) are criminals, which due the amount of these devices result absurd to say. As often, periodists write and share half understood news. In Spain as also in the rest of the EU, phones and messages of individuals can only be intercepted by the police with a court order in a criminal investigation, not globaly like in the US. There may be cases when an individual under criminal investigation deletes incriminating messages, which can be punished for concealment of evidences.

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      What a coincidence that it was the guy protesting the police who was also suspected of possessing such materials. If it turns out they had real independent grounds to suspect he had such images, I’ll change this view, but for now I assume that’s the cops’ standard line to shut down people’s questions. Just say they thought the political target had CSAM, and immediately people see him differently, plus the police can accuse anyone who challenges their actions of supporting pedophiles.

    • Homosexual sapiens@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      They implied that based on his use of grapheneOS/erasure of the device. In reality he is a Stop Cop City activist. The fascists just want to associate good privacy and security practices with criminality and depravity.