Funny how the poster has the same name as the website as well

Maybe start with empathy next time.

A number of people who I have known to have that mindset faced a lot of hardship growing up. They had so much working against them for so long that it’s hard for them to see instances when they have control or to understand when some things are actually their fault.

No doubt answered with “we’re a family here” nonsense, all while the company makes record profits and the executives get compensated with a giant bag of cash. Yuck.

I have already made my argument, thanks for stopping in.

Who is without bias?

Certainly not you

They have a vested interest in making Russia look weak. They are not unbiased.

Not mod, but a Ukrainian source writing about Russian losses seems a bit biased to me.

Sounds like a see a doctor thing to me.

Ok, MAGA

I think it’s going to be partisan regardless. Unfortunately, from this article, it’s not clear to me the length of their term. If they constantly have to seek reelection then I believe it would be even more partisan than being appointed for a set term.

I would prefer appointments approved by Congress with both term limits and a maximum age. Judges should have minimal political incentive.

Research sponsored by Dr Robotnik?

What do you think would happen if the best NBA team played the best WNBA team? I think the men would win.

What do you think would happen if professional basketball was mixed? I’d imagine the teams would be 90% men.

Also, if track and field records are any indication, men are strong and faster. Separate divisions are more fair.

No, men and women are not physically equal.

I don’t really mind the idea of Republicans. Their execution is the problem. If they really were focused on small government, national defense, low taxes, the second amendment and pro-life, I could understand it (though I am decidedly pro-choice). It’s the disingenuous nature of it all that gets me.

I also don’t really like the Democratic party. They tend to make big promises that never fully materialize.

I’d prefer they talk about problems, not the entire voting population. I’m even open to “the Democrats need to nominate a better candidate” or “MAGA is garbage” but not “Americans are X”.

I would never criticize the entire voting population or say something like “I don’t know why Americans allow X to happen”. My criticisms are specific and targeted towards certain groups of people who are working against our interests.

I don’t mind it but I draw a line at criticism of the entire electorate. Many of us know that things are broken and we’d fix it if we could.

Edit: clarity. The entire electorate

I find there to be a more honest discussion here. Also, I really like that it’s not run by some giant VC fueled company that is driven to make as much money as possible. It’s more like a public utility where the cost is distributed among multiple instance owners. However, I am concerned about their rise in costs over time and I hope there is a plan for revenue. I’d be willing to pay.

While I’m here, I hope you all still use reddit a bit and mention Lemmy on there occasionally. I think the community can still grow.