This was mostly created by the one child policy that ran from 1979-2016, coupled with male child preference. In China, a male child is responsible for taking care of his own parents, while females are responsible for caring for their in-laws.
This was mostly created by the one child policy that ran from 1979-2016, coupled with male child preference. In China, a male child is responsible for taking care of his own parents, while females are responsible for caring for their in-laws.
Solid perspective.
Do you happen to know where they keep the hot sauce? I can’t find an employee anywhere.
I agree. That’s just the counterargument I often see.
Yes, abducting 19K children from another nation and putting them up for adoption in your country is genocide.
In comparison, 4.2M Ukrainian refugees have been given amnesty throughout the EU, and are free to leave when they’d like.
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/infographics/ukraine-refugees-eu/
If Russia was truly “trying to protect children from a war zone,” the children would not be put up for adoption, but given temporary refuge where they could leave at their own will or by coordinating with the Ukrainian government.
Litteringand…litteringand….litteringand…
The Uyghur genocide and forced labor in Xinjiang is supported by the import of inexpensive Chinese goods, primarily clothing and textiles. Consumers have more direct control over that genocide than others through boycotts.
The odds of them doing it are still better than the odds of Republicans doing it.
We can. The embargo does not affect food donations.
§ 515.206(b) of the CACR stipulates that the prohibitions in the CACR do not apply to transactions incident to the donation of food to nongovernmental organizations or individuals in Cuba.
https://www.state.gov/fact-sheet-provision-of-humanitarian-assistance-to-cuba/
I think they’re both unconscionable.
That’s funny. I read on Lemmy that the horrific treatment of the Uyghurs was just western propaganda. Now what am I to believe?
I’m not sure about Australia’s laws, but in the US, that could result in recusal of the judge on the grounds of bias.
This is absolutely necessary for anyone born before ~1985. I have so many “random facts” memorized from pre-internet days, and many of them have turned out to be half-right hearsay or straight up incorrect when faced with fact-checking.
I knew a woman whose sole job was maintaining COBOL servers for IBM. She did it for close to 20 years before they updated those servers a few years ago. Not even her supervisor knew how to check her work. lol
Reminds me of the MacBook Wheel lol
You sound just like the Republicans that say we shouldn’t support Ukraine because it’s a failed state. There’s no justification for genocide.
Are you being serious right now? The sinicization of Tibet began in 1951. It was ruled a genocide over 60 years ago. It continues to this day.
Either you have an agenda, or you need to read more.
You’re joking, right? That’s the point of boycotting, divesting, and sanctioning- to stop providing income to a nation. The US absolutely financially supports the Tibetan and Uyghur genocide through commerce, trade, and investments.
You also can’t commit fraud, slander, or false advertising with speech, yell fire in a crowded building, or use speech to incite any criminal actions.