I’d pay even more taxes without a single complaint if they got big businesses and the uber rich to actually pay their taxes correctly and fully
I’d pay even more taxes without a single complaint if they got big businesses and the uber rich to actually pay their taxes correctly and fully
Whoa - hyprland is made by a transphobe?
Edit: whoa it really is. I joined their discord and saw like, very strict anti-lgbtqphobic rules and thought that they must be good. But looking into him… Turns out the rules are there because he’d let it fester into a 4chan toxic hellhole
Seems up to me!
I don’t really dispute that but at least we are able to apply formal analytical methods with repeatable outcomes. LLMs might (and do) achieve a similar result but they do so without any formal approach that can be reviewed, which has its drawbacks.
I never made any “AI bad” arguments (in fact, I said that they may be incredibly well suited to this) I just argued for the correct use of words and you hallucinated.
You said “they literally do analyze text” when that is not, literally, what they do.
And no, we don’t “all know” that. Lay persons have no way of knowing whether AI products currently in use have any capacity for genuine understanding and reasoning, other than the fact that the promotional material uses words like “understanding”, “reasoning”, “thought process”, and people talking about it use the same words. The language we choose to use is important!
The person you’re replying to is correct though. They do not understand, they do not analyse. They generate (roughly) the most statistically likely answer to your prompt, which may very well end up being text representing an accurate analysis. They might even be incredibly reliable at doing so. But this person is just pushing back against the idea of these models actually understanding or analysing. Its slightly pedantic, sure, but its important to distinguish in the world of machine intelligence.
I mean this person seems to be not doing it maliciously. As they say, if it wasn’t them, it would be someone else. Pushing archive to improve their security is great for everyone. As long as this person doesn’t do anything actually malicious, they’re in the clear as far as I’m concerned.
*if you’re paying for a TV license
looks at your instance domain
Carry on
I genuinely can’t fucking stand this. It never breaks away cleanly and it just makes it annoying to share because the pieces are all different sizes
The fat funny character.
The “I can fix them” love interest.
Any situation that could have been resolved with any modicum of healthy communication.
Superheroes that cause more damage to the place they’re trying to “save”.
I thiiiink they’re modding the game but still playing on official hardware, so they might be in the clear for now (until Nintendo goes further)
James Acaster earned my eternal respect with that whole bit
To quote a wise sage
“please mark as NSFW~🤗” - recursive_recursion
Nothing wrong with calling out evil wherever it is
“I thought we were past low effort video game movies” borderlands literally just happened
Miss Kobayashi’s Dragon Maid was pretty cozy, and features primarily adult characters.
Dafuq is this ai slop