I honestly don’t see a difference

But the other Paypalpatine is building the precrime Minority Report machine. We’re really getting the worst of all these fucking shitheads combined.

Some downtown big cities had the buildings interconnected.

Another odd Canadian one. It has been codified that a suspect saying the words “I’m sorry” cannot be used as proof of guilt. Since in Canada especially, it leans a bit more into meaning “pardon” or “excuse me” rather than how an American might interpret it more as an apology.

The name of the accused can’t usually be reported on in Canada. Though there seems to be many exceptions. Also, released offenders get a lot of protection. It’s pretty controversial, especially when it’s someone famous like this case.

It’s fine. We know you’ll call the BBC a leftist rag.

In conservative media, sure.

First off, block every Russian IP

If you don’t punch back they will simply continue to steamroll anyone they see as inferior.

Wow. Ok, I’m glad now my doctor went with such a low dose now.

That sounds more like mushrooms.

Grey, faded, like everything was some distance away.

Totally not for me.

Financial times, Newsweek

What does a colour have to do with who they fuck?

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò: Macron married a tranny, Obama ‘accompanied by muscular man in wig’. [146]

Fucking hell. This is the shit they take seriously!

It doesn’t appeal to me either but I can imagine for some people it would

Do you not believe in casual, not romantic sex?

Ah, there it is. Yeah, what a mystery.

Did you not see images of it before it fell? Was it one of these? it was nearby at least.

9/11 was sort of an inside job by the architects. Built during the height of the cold war, every mega construction project would have had to address what would happen if attacked. There had been a number of massive skyscraper fires already and even much smaller buildings had no way to effectively douse the flames. Imagine a massive raging inferno towering above a dense population centre for weeks or months or who knows how long. It would have been an even worse outcome. The health and mental health effects would have been incredibly devastating. A decision had to be made. A structural, engineered weakness to very hot flames was built in to make the towers implode on themselves, snuffing out the flames.

It would have been a tough call to make. Like the trolly problem, do you engineer it to save the occupants? Or the potential health of the rest of the city?

It makes sense to me to keep quiet about it after the fact. The architects did what they had to do and some people would not agree with their decision. Therefore due to ‘national security’ or whatever it’s best to just keep quiet. I’ve held on to this theory for a while but I think it’s been long enough to discuss it.