America was good enough for him to stay and make millions. As soon as things aren’t perfect, he wants to run to where the grass is greener. That’s a good reason to be angry.

Because their “politics” usually involves everyone ignoring their grievances in favor of preserving celebrities’ comfort.

Fuck that. Get your able-bodied ass back here and help us fix this shit, you coward!

In the owner’s manual, it says you consent to data collection by driving the car and if you don’t consent, you should return the car to the nearest dealer.

Why does “some kind of enforcement” need to involve violating the privacy of everyone, including people who don’t drive like dangerous cunts? Do you really think there’s no other way to enforce traffic laws?

The best example I’ve heard is, if I wait outside your house and follow you around everywhere you go, every single time you leave the house, even though you’re “in public,” that’s still a crime and it’s called “stalking.”

🌮 🌮 🌮 🌮 🌮 🌮 🌮 🌮 🌮 🌮 🌮 🌮

Lol. Lmao.

Don’t threaten me with a good time

No joke, the day after it happened, they said they were gonna wait a week to even vote on whether or not he was allowed to do it.

Depending on where you live, being armed with four shots of bourbon in you may not be legal.

This is what I’m talking about; for some reason, even US citizens think we have no gun control laws whatsoever.

One side wants, enables, and defends fascism. The other side only offers token resistance and refuses to allow any populist or progressive candidates onto the presidential ballot (remember when Bernie Sanders won the vote to be nominated in 2016 and the DNC said “no” and appointed Hillary Clinton anyway?). Biden promised to codify Roe v Wade, un-schedule cannabis, and forgive student loan debt. None of those things happened. Instead, corporations were given priority over the voters, on every issue, for another election cycle, so the hard Rs could continue their corporatism and fascism unimpeded as soon as they were elected again.

When the end result of electing one is corporatism and fascism, and the end result of electing the other is still corporatism and fascism, but four years later, who cares whether there’s any technical distinction between them?

The gun laws enforcement agencies talk about not enforcing are the “assault weapon” bans. The reason they don’t want to do that is because these laws set a dangerous precedent where millions of US citizens become criminals overnight, at the stroke of a pen, for owning something that is extremely common and was completely legal the day before.

They don’t want to go door-to-door demanding they confiscate people’s guns because, number one, thats what fascists do, and number two, that’s how shootouts happen. Can’t say I blame them.

Fine. If you would shoot someone for any reason other than protect the safety of yourself or another from an immediate, identifiable threat, you shouldn’t be allowed to own and carry firearm.

The US media is owned by the same oligarchs who benefit from his fascism. Why would they bite the hand that feeds?

If you would shoot someone over a parking spot, you shouldn’t be able to own a gun.

For the non-US people out there, you should know the shooter will lose his second ammendment rights following this incident. A conviction for any violent crime, even domestic violence, makes it illegal for you to own or possess firearms, and will cause you to fail the background check required for any and all gun purchases (yes, even at gun shows). There’s a grace period where you’re allowed to surrender to the police any guns you can’t legally sell, but after that, it’s illegal to own or possess any firearms for life.

For some reason, I feel like a lot of people, even US citizens, don’t realize this.

“This debate would be solved if everyone would just agree to one choice.”