Thunderbolt if a bit of gore and violence is your game.

Agreed, just thought it hilarious

It does make sense and the issue here isn’t communal service periods but for making it only the young which “by chance” makes it so almost everyone who had any hand in it wouldn’t have to do it ever.

If it were every citizen had to do some form of labor for some period I don’t think anyone would have much of an argument.

The dollop episode 472.

https://open.spotify.com/episode/1Hkhctuxa2IdZki0oQ6UFe&ved=2ahUKEwip2O_k7OSKAxUTv4kEHbCVJGsQjjh6BAgaEAE&usg=AOvVaw2REEkTbT4OgFe4ttxHINA1

I dunno about NYC but Chicago has a pretty large and diverse public transit system.

That said the first bus I got onto in Chicago clearly hit a parked car that was too far over the line and the driver just sorta shrugged and kept on truckin’.

It’s insult to injury that the IDF have been killing paramedics for years saying that all Palestinian ambulances are Hamas in disguise, turns out it’s just projection.

They can’t in this case.

In your example they essentially used the same basis as felony murder (which I don’t agree with but whatever) in that they do not know who did pulled the trigger and made the enhancements threat but there’s no argument both were there.

In this case there’s only one person there during the shooting and that’s on video, it physically and logically could not be two people and therefore two convictions are unlikely to hold.

Automatically? No, almost nothing but enhancements are automatic.

What I hear you saying it is not just possible but probable.

Sure. But you said there isn’t a mechanism for it, there clearly is.

Reversed, released, overturned are all the same thing and happen literally daily. Where did you get your information that a conviction can’t be changed?

Ed: reading your source it hinged on the crime technically being capable of being committed by multiple people and this one clearly can’t be.

They can once they release that conviction but it goes to show ineptitude and malfeasance which casts doubt on any further attempt to convict someone. And yes it would, shadow of a doubt is a high standard and a second conviction is a huge amount of doubt.

Factual innocence is different, it’s a positive defense for literally any criminal charge.

I think that’s exactly where it’s going. Get convicted, real killer confesses and the state can’t pursue a crime they’ve convicted someone for.

True but we also have to sell it or the price “has” to skyrocket locally.

I think it’s worse than that. I think the building red tape was intentional to drag out the war as long as possible so Russia as always will continue to dump resources into it until it bankrupts them both militarily and economically.

Already did

The fig app is kinda helpful of you haven’t tried it.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Language matters General Vagueness.

It’s 100% relevant, the author uses legitimate locations which home specific political views that are also reflected in the book.

If you had said created the political entities of […] you’d be right though I suspect like many you thought East Asia was made up for the book. It isn’t.