This is the correct take.
Content warnings on everything seems silly until you think about what the alternative is. It’s much better to have largely uncensored media that people can engage with intellectually, making their own decisions if they want to experience it or not.
The alternative is visible in the advertiser-friendly hellscape that mainstream social media has become, where people can’t even say words like “kill” or “drug” without being buried by the algorithm.
For a healthy society to exist, people need to be able to interact with sensitive topics and challenging ideas.










It really depends from building to building.
If the building has a ton of bandwidth, good QoS rules and not too many people on the network all at once, the only downside is that you won’t have any control over the network and cant make any changes.
If the building has a shitty connection, no QoS, or too many people, then you are likely to get bad service.