• mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      And the secure “lockdown” mode on iOS disables push notifications for exactly this reason. But the vast majority of people don’t use lockdown mode in their day to day, because it kills a lot of the functionality of the phone. Lockdown mode is intended for people who may actually be targeted by laser-focused hacking attempts. Politicians, celebrities, people with high security clearance, etc… It’s not something that the average person would use.

      Apple even publishes this as a known vulnerability. It’s due to the way push notifications work. Similar to SMS, push notifications default to unencrypted because there isn’t a single unified system. Each carrier and cell manufacturer handles push notifications differently, so they’re kept unencrypted so that the public encryption key doesn’t get lost during transit; That would just result in scrambled junk messages.

  • aizakku@waterloolemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s paywalled for me so can’t see this all. But does this mean signal, rcs and other encrypted messages are being logged? Kind of defeats the purpose of privacy based use cases if so

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    And that is why we use ntfy :)
    Not the main instance ofc because then you have one big silo again, but there are plenty of publicly hosted servers.

    • TaviRider@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      Part of that is the responsibility of the app developer, since they define the payload that appears in the APNs push message. It’s possible for them to design it such that the push message really just says “time to ping your app server because something changed”. That minimizes the amount of data exposed to Apple, and therefore to law enforcement.

      For instance the MDM protocol uses APNS. It tells the device that it’s time to reach out to the MDM server for new commands. The body of the message does not contain the commands.

      That still necessarily reveals some metadata, like the fact that a message was sent to a device at a particular time. Often metadata is all that law enforcement wants for fishing expeditions. I think we should be pushing back on law enforcement’s use of broad requests (warrants?) for server data. We can and should minimize the data that servers have, but there’s limits. If servers can hold nothing, then we no longer have a functional Internet. Law enforcement shouldn’t feel entitled to all server data.

    • scratsearcher 🔍🔮📊🎲@sopuli.xyzBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      android vs linux: round 2 electric bugaloo

      • android: comes preinstalled with google play services
      • linux: comes preinstalled with whatever package manager your distro uses
  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m actually surprised this came up again. Wasn’t this a thing back like a year and a half ago or something as well? I remember a big push to get on unified push about then.