• jia_tan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 年前

    I have a different strategy, it’s called 3210:

    3 TB of data at stake

    split between 2 drives

    only 1 copy

    0 shids given

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 年前

      It’s why the paid services are successful. Another option I heard about is to have a “data buddy” so you both install a NAS at each other’s house, sort out access etc and that’s your off-site.

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 年前

      Yeah. My solution is raspberry pi w/WireGuard + HDD at inlaws. Initial backup was done locally, nightly backups rsync’d over (I don’t generate a ton of data, so it’s mostly just photos from my phone).

        • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 年前

          We “only” have ~35Mbps upload, but that’s plenty since the initial backup was the only large transfer. Daily backup transfers are generally pretty small for me.

          But getting the initial transfer done locally was definitely important for my use case!

              • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 年前

                Exactly — this is ~10GB every 6 hours (which is probably a reasonable amount of time to run a backup while not interfering with active Internet use).

                Basically the only backup-worthy content I generate is casual photos and videos, and these are nowhere near that size (Immich database backups also take up a bit but I could certainly be smarter about how I handle these backups).

    • Forbo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 年前

      It’s not all that expensive. The cost of storage is constantly decreasing over time. You can get a safe deposit box for something like $10/year if you also want the added benefit of an offline copy. I haven’t looked at cloud storage pricing, so I dunno what that runs.

    • qaz@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 年前

      It’s not the expensive. I have about 150GB backed up and it costs about $1 a month

  • NickwithaC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 年前

    I have three copies, one on my nvme SSD one on my sata SSD and one in my OneDrive account which I can only assume is HDDs on the other end so I’m probably doing it right.

  • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 年前

    For home use it’s decent enough to have 2 copies, and 1 off-site.

    Especially if 1 of your copies has some kind of redundancy, like RAID 1.

  • xia@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 年前

    I like to add “0”… which somehow relates to not having untested restore systems.

  • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 年前

    Just realised my primary, backup and offsites are all spinning platter disks. When they say two types of storage, what does that mean exactly?

    • SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 年前

      Differing kinda of storage in case one doesn’t work with the device being restored to, or something happens that’s more likely to affect one type of media than the other. A strong electrical field could scramble the hell out of spinning rust’s magnetic media, while doing nothing to optical media, for example.

  • jjagaimo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 年前

    I’ve got 3 local copies. What are you gonna do about it?

    Fr tho, main pc, NAS and laptop. Trying to help friend build a NAS and then swap offsite backup space.