• Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eeBanned from communityEnglish
            22·
            2 years ago

            But that just means its issue is it’s verbally unfamiliar, no?

            Makes me wonder how many people read scriptures/manifestos.

              • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eeBanned from communityEnglish
                22·
                2 years ago

                Welp, there goes anyone’s claims here of being an authentic political theorist/scholar/analyst.

                Perhaps, based on that, the issue is expectations. One expects a certain outcome from how someone is explaining something and is thrown off-guard when it takes a twist. Though that’s not really anyone’s fault. I relate too well to the other perspective, as a non-native speaker who is, in some way, also neurodivergent, as well as a writer immersed in mental exercises. I just have had a kind of faith that one might say it’s a universally trainable skill (think math or jigsaw puzzles) rather than seemingly innate. I may read The Wheel of Time and War and Peace just fine if I don’t establish my own upper limit to complexity. Interactive AI, through their lack of the issue we discuss, implicitly show us that “unintelligible” and “complex” may overlap but don’t necessarily have to.

    • ajoebyanyothername@lemmy.world
      31·
      2 years ago

      It reads like a question simultaneously sent through google translate and a thesaurus. I’ve tried several times, but I just cannot work out what I’m being asked.

  • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    1·
    2 years ago

    One time I accidentally said a kid’s name on a 2-way radio, and we were not supposed to use their names over the airwaves.

    I’m not sure if I had critics thought, it was just a mistake