For example people with jobs that require carrying a lot of equipment: plumbers, electricians, roofers, etc. . We don’t want everybody to suddenly “be a roofer”

  • bryndos@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    Vehicles and drivers are all separately licensed and taxed anyway - so most of the infrastructure is there.

    For commercial use - tie it into the owners tax return.

    Disabled people get a blue badge anyway to get the parking spaces.

    • atro_city@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      For commercial use - tie it into the owners tax return.

      What do you mean by this? In what way would it be “tied”?

      • bryndos@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        ‘Tied’ by identity, owner owns vehicle (with license) , owner pays vehicle tax and or road tax and income tax.

        You could , say, tax vehicles by weight or size. Each extra metre, each extra kilogram, tax goes up, a lot.

        Then , if the owner makes commercial income from activity deemed to depend on haulage, and is due to pay income/corporation tax, then they could be allowed to a claim a vehicle tax deduction. If they don’t make (or won’t declare to tax authority) the commercial income, then there’s nothing to deduct from, so they pay the whole vehicle tax - or lose their vehicle/license.

        If the owner wants to commit tax fraud by misdeclaring income, then the tax enforcement regime is already in place.

        not a perfect system i’m sure , but its a possible mechanism using tax and licensing authorities that maybe already exist in many countries.