

There’s a giant, glowing, animated LED billboard along a main road near my house that had a PSA about distracted driving on it the other day. It made me angry.


There’s a giant, glowing, animated LED billboard along a main road near my house that had a PSA about distracted driving on it the other day. It made me angry.


deleted by creator
Im sorry dude but if your argument is reddit and stackoverflow are the basis for being “better than what the majority of people can manage” then I just have to respectfully disagree.
AI doesn’t produce data suitable for training AI. It’s a huge problem when AI generated slop makes its way into the training set because it generally degrades the quality of the model. Like a photocopy of a photocopy.
So where is all the data its trained on to surpass most people come from? Do you think they’re curating what they feed it based on IQ scores or something? Verifying accuracy, competency, etc? Or are you aware they just turn on the reddit/stackoverflow/github/etc. scrapers and start pumping them full of unfiltered 100% pure grade A internet bullshit?
if the majority of people were incapable of meeting the standard of AI, then AI wouldn’t have enough data to train on to be better than the majority. it’s a lossy database of things that already exist, it cannot create novelty or surpass its training set.


Yeah of course they matter, thanks for making really weird assumptions about my morals based on a domain name you fucking weirdo. Do they justify supporting any given country invading them is the question here. I don’t think there’s a number that could get me to support that but it seems like you have one you’re just not willing to name it. So far it’s narrowed down between 6 and 36000.


So you don’t currently feel it would be justified to overthrow the US government over what happened in MN? Interesting.
Edit: so what’s the threshold here? How many they gotta execute in the streets for you to support Iran bringing freedom to the American people?


Imagine if Iran sent planes loaded with bombs to the US because of the MN protestors getting killed.


He almost got himself and Peter Thiel killed by crashing a $1m car while trying to show off for Thiel. He got kicked out of PayPal for nearly bankrupting the company and insisting that they switch all their servers from Unix to windows for no fucking reason.
So yeah, he’s always been like this.
Someone once said the bottom to me nearly verbatim for questioning the Iraq war. My grandmother once asked me if I wanted to go to hell because I laughed at Bush Jr fumbling his words.
We’ve been there for a lot longer than people are willing to admit.


I would give anything to skim an article rather than sit through a 10 minute video for the one thing I need to know.


I’m not familiar with the exact techniques used but I am aware that there are ways of fingerprinting images that would survive such transformations.


a lot of the big names in image generation fingerprint the images they output to make them easy to filter out of training data. theres a possibility they could detect this fairly easily.


im sorry but that lever did not have a sharp resonating tremor that reverberated into my soul so it is, regretfully, inferior


Doesn’t compare to the satisfying click of playing with the forbidden spring loaded metal door.
I ate at a McD last week in NV and the fries were in the expected cardboard carton and not as pictured.


FYAD is more coherent and trustworthy than LLM output.


I started doing this after my roommate got upset with me because she blindly sat down and fell in. Then she got upset because she interpreted putting the lid down as passive aggressive.


Should they be? Absolutely. Will they be? lol
So he used an AI tool to “organize” references and it hallucinated crap that made it into the human-written article because he never reviewed the output for accuracy.
This guy writes about AI for a living, he knows it hallucinates, and he even acknowledges the irony but never explains why he thought experimenting with AI was a good idea to begin with. Am I supposed to assume his judgment was impaired by being sick?