Career politicians tend to be rich themselves, they can’t even imagine someone being unable to afford a flying car.

Blocking any domain that has “consent” in it is never a mistake.

It’s only a part of the fascists’ playbook. The really dangerous part is where they use the system against itself and destroy it from within.

I envision this as an army of Dalek like contraptions following around site workers and harrassing them with their paint ball guns.

And it was known to be stupid in the 1990s already. The only people who benefit from it are the investors. Everyone else pays for their dividend.

Your mileage may vary, but it’s still possible to install some distros without those nonsensical containerised “package managers”, or to at least remove them after installation. It unfortunately takes an increasing amount of effort, especially in distros that are actively trying to push their flavour of containerised package manager. (Totally not looking at Ubuntu and Snap)

What is working in our favour here is the fragmentation, which will prevent, or at least slow down a too widespread adoption of those systems.

Fake. That’s legible, so it can’t be a legit doctor’s prescription.

Use an ad blocker and the traffic is of little value to them. Especially if it only goes to /r/place and doesn’t allow to create much of a profile.

It would be a shame if someone conspired to coordinate such a thing…