He is right, and they are also actively working on destabilizing many other parts of the world.

Clown

We all know for which side of this war they are playing

After all we have seen since then, I’m not surprised. They can’t be trusted.

Nice

This is too much, disgusting. They have had immunity for too long

First he creates the problem, then uses it to extort allies.

The senile individual that doesn’t know what to do after he messed it up, keeps mentioning idiotic things. Those threats don’t have the effect he thinks they have.

WINE and ReactOS having that statement for protection, makes sense for obvious reasons, given the nature and aim of the project. Even if, as we agree, it is totally unenforceable.

This total AI ban trend we are seeing in recent times, while similar, lacks the self protection reason and the text of the link backs it up with more abstract things such as: “erodes trust”, “makes it more difficult to review code”, “harms privacy”, etc. All good intentions, quite a show against this new type of tool (that has its problems yes), but with the only practical consequence of pushing people away.

I would prefer a set of stricter guidelines and standards, to make it easy to reject slop and bad (vibe coded) contributions.

I think that contributions should be evaluated by their content, which the contributor has full responsibility, instead of trying to impose rules you can’t 100% verify just because they look good on paper.

• The patch is good (in quality terms), accept it.
• The contributor created a successive set of bad and lousy submissions? Block it for a period of time.

Putting a “ban” on how the code is generated, is just a statement of good intentions that you can’t enforce or verify.

Disgusting

Ignore Trump and carry on

I’m pretty sure the same applies for Russia and Israel, and yet the ICC is after their presidents for breaking “other laws”.

Is he afraid he could become the next target of an investigation/warrant of the ICC?

Anyhow the world is changing very quickly and nowadays not doing business with the united states or not using the dollar, is less and less of a problem.

To me, it’s like discussing how much domestic abuse is allowed in a relationship.

But it is not. And a frank discussion about the subject to define what is acceptable and what is not, is key to a healthy community and project. Hardline stand on each end just make that discussion impossible, on purpose.

In my view having a healthy discussion about this is a good thing. People will always have different views in many things, and it is natural that a common ground is achieved by having a honest debate about a given subject.

With the above in mind, hardline 100% pro or 100% con points of view are usually wrong and counterproductive, and even framing the discussion that way is harmful. I hope the discussion leads to a good and reasonable outcome.

Both are fine. Is it just a matter of preference on certain decisions.

I’m interested. Any info on how much it will cost?

Exactly

Welcome Canada. Looking forward to do business with Canadians in a respectful and mutually beneficial way.