Lemmy.

And the comment after that clarified that this article is about nuclear bomb test, not a nuclear powered vehicle, to which you then replied with the absolutely ludicrous statement that the distinction isn’t important.

Feel free to keep arguing, but you’re just putting on your clown make up right now.

Testing a nuclear reactor (which happens all the time, all over the place) is very different from testing a nuclear bomb.

The distinction literally couldn’t be more fucking important.

They won’t have to work ever again.

It’s still possible. Even with the particular severity of guilt, life sentences are usually commuted to probation after 16 to 20 years, which would still give him 7 to 3 years until retirement age.

It’s great when you don’t need it, but sometimes you just do.

Well, OP just said “efficiently” … nothing about the quality. So you are technically correct.

Is that the one with the overdramatic acting?

I’m also an immigrant (though EU Schengen zone). I have a little plastic ID card (actually two, one from my home country and one from my resident country) but that’s about it for identification.

I guess I also have my rent- and work contracts … though I’m not quite sure where they are.

Does my vaccination card count as a document?

Absolutely. Mostly because I block most of them so I can’t see their posts in the first place.

You guys have documents?

I’m somehow forced into a couple’s hotdog eating contest.

I’m not responsible for the comments of others.

Well, if you are unwilling or unable to have conversations that are more than one comment deep, I guess … bye.

believe in trickle down economics… Uh, that’s political.

Yes. But not extremist. It’s been the main talking point of republicans for years …

Well, no, the comment I replied to

Ok … but there is more context on the comments preceding that one.

billionaire withholding resources they don’t need from society is a political position

Well, they don’t think they are withholding resources, probably think they are helping with investments, trickledown and bullshit. So it’s literally not a political position they hold. It doesn’t even make sense as one as all it does would paint yourself as the problem.

Of course I do, but that is not at all the question here.

The question is whether or not individual billionaires are political extremists. And I don’t see why they would need to be. I’m sure a lot are, but that’s just a correlation.

I don’t see how it would be.

Sure, like on the business side and stuff.

But wanting more money isn’t really a religious or political position and you don’t really need hold an extremist position to be able to become one, as the main stream political system already allows that.

Ah ok, so you’re just using the word “extremists” to mean someone that does something extreme. That makes more sense.

Do you want to elaborate why that is so obvious to you?