Amy is ‘any’ in witness protection. The downvoters put her there."

Auto correct for any

Uh, idk, I’m not the one arguing for it either.

Oh so you just ignored any counter to your main argument and go on full confrontation while being very ignorant of your username as well.

Him. I think I’ll check out of this conversation. There’s no use talking to ignorants.

Before we to on to the next topic, did we establish that the environmental impact of AI is not really a concern for you anymore, and you used it as a scapegoat earlier?

Data centers can in principle be built environmently friendly (like mobility or heating, unlike air travel or animal farming) The reason none of these are concerned with environmental impact is that the whole US of A shits on the environment and has zero regulations for anything. There is the real issue, and avoiding data centers helps exactly nothing in the larger picture.

Don’t be hypocritical with singling out the one technology that you happen to dislike for other reasons.

Be embarrassed about falling for misleading misinformation. When concerned about environmental issues we have way way way larger issues to address than data centers.

For clarity, I don’t say their impact is nil, just that it pales in comparison. For example with industrial animal farming.

What did you expect? I responded very on topic to the post, and you had no other response than to blow out your generic AI hatred.

Woosh, apparently. Let me explain.

LLMs are virtually nowhere used without some sort of harness these days, most prominently agent harnesses.

Skills are a harness artifact for reusable prompts where we encapsulate small terminology or large processes. People who use them quickly come up with or reuse a skill that will lead the agent to lead interviews to get a common understanding of key issues before going to action.

As for no 2, idk why that’s so relevant for automation. Often after an extensive interview the agent proposes solutions like I’d envision them, but much more thoroughly written out, in a quality and consistency that maybe a much reviewed and discussed RFC reaches, but I typically not. Sometimes it suggests solutions that I didn’t think of, but when poked it’s usually an elegant one. I don’t suppose the agent came up with these things itself, but it certainly has read many more books than I did, so that’s not objectable.

Username doesn’t check out.

And that alone is worth a lot

don’t ask questions

Skill issue, in the most literal sense possible.

Sane people do. But the site is filled with AI haters who press downvote as soon as someone recommends using AI for Amy thing whatsoever.

Recently my Agent came back from a research task stating it had to complete various captchas but succeeded, then it reported the results.

Oh, in that case name medicine. Long life expectancy and low child death rates really suck for the climate.

But but … These are effective altruists who due to their great technology will better theblifes of billions and trillions of people who are not even born yet, or so they say.

Catastrophes don’t need to kill everyone to still be considered catastrophic. D’uh. Remarkable insights.

Air conditioning alone will not hold off the water from the coast metropolis, where something like 50% of the world population will have to relocate.

Indeed I see there’s a difference. AI is much more than just the tech Bros version of it. If transferred to social media, the outrage would want to abolish not only Instagram and TicToc, but also the fediverse.

I don’t see that