I remember a time in my life where this kind of story would have concerned me a bit. Those days are long gone now though. They’ve cried wolf way too many times.

Regardless of what they call it, they’re the ones presenting it. I’m not arguing they can’t be tricked. I’m arguing they are fundamentally different concepts. One is offering you a choice of sources, the other is making a claim. That’s a pretty big distinction in a whole mess is different ways. Not the least of which is legal.

At the top, but that isn’t what this post is saying. This is saying that Google’s AI gave the scammer answer. Not that they provided a link you could click on, but that Google itself said this is the number.

Would that make Google liable? I mean that wouldn’t be a case of users posting information that would be a case of Google posting information in that case wouldn’t it? So it seems to me they’d be legally liable at that point.

I’m not eligible to vote by mail in my state, not many people are.

They are pretty fucking sweet

deleted by creator

Yeah this kind of rhetoric doesn’t sound at all like a deranged psychopath who believes in exterminating the “other”…

deleted by creator

I would love to see how you defend the argument that Iran doesn’t care about the US election results. That’d be a fascinating exercise to see done.

Not entirely sure climate change couldn’t just be argued to be the cause of all the others there.

Changing climate did have a major impact on all of those Empires though.

The US already has elected judges, they’re so incredibly bad we barely even bother to write about it anymore. I know people talk about who are they beholden to? But that’s the irrelevant question actually. The real problem is a judge that’s elected has to campaign. And there’s no greater source of corruption in all of politics than campaigning. No amount of patronage will ever equal the amount of corruption that comes from going around and begging rich people for money so you can be elected.

I don’t see how you would Escape that especially this week

You know there really aren’t enough users and communities on Lemmy that spamming an article multiple times across multiple communities isn’t very apparent and visible to everybody. I highly recommend in the future spacing it out a bit. Because I think the natural inclination of people when they see something four or five times in a row is to get annoyed at it.

You’re reading that wrong, it’s not comparing Hamas to Israel, it’s comparing Hamas death to journalist deaths. As in which one does Israel have the better ratio on.

Has anyone ever compared Israel’s kill rate when it comes to journalists compared to Hamas? I think they have a higher ratio for the former.

Why don’t you just block everybody who doesn’t like it? Then it can just be you and the bot alone on all the threads.

Once again the US is still at war with North Korea, that means all North Korean troops in the Ukraine are valid targets.

Not into NK