Thanks I know this, but you have to go back to when the region was settled by the Jewish people to really get any context

lol I didn’t dodge anything, I am saying that given the historical context of how we’ve arrived at this conflict, there’s really one reasonable option

read the history of how Palestine was formed, people have been treating each other like shit forever. The future can be better… hopefully idk

That’s why a two state solution is the most ethical and humanitarian way forward

Why shouldn’t the Jewish people have a homeland or their own country?

These winners are humanitarian and anti-genocide. If Israel gets a sane, non-racist government, then I think most reasonable people wouldn’t criticize Israel, and certainly would support any actions it needs to defend itself. The reality is that there are people who are both anti-Semitic and want Israel to cease to exist for racist reasons. Most people who are anti-genocide are not such people.

They don’t, it’s for track driving and racing as a hobby

It’s probably not just adults

Apple products have really great temp resistance

I hate South Park. It’s occasionally funny, this is not one of those occasions

That’s fair

I kinda admire human…creativity, I guess? I mean, this dude understands the meaning of YOLO

The word fag needs to be taken back from the haters. My first encounter with it was in the context of cigarettes.

Just be careful that you’re both designating each other as a beneficiary on any insurance, 401K/other retirement vehicles, or other assets (stocks, bonds, housing, accounts etc). If she’s not legally your spouse, she’s not going to be automatically entitled to any assets if she’s widowed or vice versa.

You both may also want to have a will or power of attorney clause given to each other in case of medical issues which prevent someone from communicating their own will. Family members get the right to act on behalf of their family, but they can’t do anything to help or protect if they’re not legally related in some way. Some places have clauses for common law spouses, but not all do, and not for all circumstances.

Probably thought the weight limit was a suggestion and not a hard constraint. Yikes

I am listening, I think it’s a case by case basis and generalizations just alienate people instead of making them empathetic or sympathetic.

I also know that people tend to downplay women’s concerns as part of misogynistic histories, so I am mindful of that too. I do my part to speak up against these kinds of patterns when I see them

Edit I am just giving my pov, I wish there was a way to know which approach is more helpful.

Edit 2 but yeah, I tend to generalize too, so I get the need to do it when something annoys you enough

This is great if you’re constipated, you’ll be expelling from both ends in no time

Not exactly, if you want me to blunt I am saying that if everywhere you go there are assholes, then the asshole is probably you. You being a woman is inconsequential

Please don’t let stupid memes color your personal life weird. Whatever is going on with you and your SO is not a “societal” issue, it’s deeply personal and you’re both mature enough (I assume) to talk like reasonable people about it. Therapy may also help

Kinda unfair, plenty of chill men. If you keep running into undesirables, please reflect on yourself