Stock android doesn’t even have a phone app. I’d say GrapheneOS is the best android. And good OK Debian is the best Linux (I don’t have the bandwidth for arch btw)

Come to !news_summary@lemmy.dbzer0.com I don’t enforce my beliefs upon anyone.

without tracking or surveillance.

Nice federal code in that URL lol.

U would be surprised what u can do with an account list a proxy list and a tor connection.

People need a purpose in life. The church gave people purpose. The bold, the brave, and the great thinkers outgrew the purpose imposed upon them by religion and forged their own path. The masses sought to follow them in the name of freedom and liberty of the mind.

Unfortunately the masses are dumb bumbling buffoons incapable of original though looking for a shepherd to guide them right into the wolf’s moor.

We used to have a couple paths of religious doctrines (where each groups members share a collective ideal) all fighting eachother. We now have a million paths of “pseudo-religious” doctrines all fighting each other. For instance the american left and right resemble a religion more than they resemble a group of political ideals.

Just remember the average person is an idiot and half of all people are dumber than that.

Was reading through the thread and holy shit I swear half the comments are anti fediverse propaganda.

I wonder how long till the post gets removed.

Edit: would it be immoral for me to mass bot the thread with AI powered pro fediverse propaganda?

Well now u have to start making value judgements on moderation actions. And that sounds like a whole new can of worms

I haven’t got their yet I’m still at the stack of old desktops sitting on top of eachother.

Wait modlog of how the use has been moderated or modlog of how the user has enacted moderation?

I though the mod who did the moderation was hidden?

Also modlog of how a user has been moderated could be biased against people who enjoy trolling tankies.

Dang

My argument is that plane travel is this safe despite TSA being so hopeless therefore the use of such speech will have no effect on actual safety and restricting it is an unnecessary restriction of liberty for no actual reason.

Yeah I’d agree. I guess anyone just sounds more assertive than some. Perhaps I should have said most.

Doesn’t someone own the copyright and thus get royalties from the new one as opposed to the good ol rainbow.

The second one, I don’t see why you shouldn’t be allowed to do that. Travel by plane is by far the safest form of transport. The TSA is actually like 90% ineffective. I mean if you do actually make a joke like that they’ll tackle you to the ground and most likely shoot you but let’s not let reality get in the way of a good philosophical discussion.

I’d argue that there is no way you could ever come to a common understanding of what is hurtful.

It’s not that we’re more individualistic than we used to be, it’s just that we’re now exposed to the entire global consciousness.

I would probably define absolute free speech the same way you did. I’ve given you my definition of free speech. And some people call my definition absolute.

Depends who says it. If Joe shmoe says it on Lemmy then id say its fine. If someone said it televised (and where knowledgeable of it being televised, if they are not then its the person televising it who is making it actionable and thus their fault) then it’s actionable and thus u can’t say it.

I’d say the sentence is a direct incitement of violence. But its not always actionable.

Get yourself a home lab, then you’ll have infinitely more stuff to configure.

I doubt that most of them have the same interpretation of absolutists in this context that you do.

I get called a free speech absolutist because I believe that you should be able to say anything that is not a direct incitement to actionable violence. Some would call that absolutist, I would not.

I guess you could argue Karl Popper’s paradox of tolerance would be an unsolvable logical error that would result.

But also I would argue that anyone who is calling anyone else a free speech absolutist is misunderstanding what that other person stands for.