If you wanna dive deeper

Better luck next time!

But did you pass that exam or did you fail?

Anyway, here is the tree:

I used https://stanza.stanford.edu/ and Universal Dependencies is correct while Constituency Parse is wrong, so I’m not the only one, even the computer got it wrong.

The thing is that “the things you believe” already sounds like a phrase so “make you unlovable” seems to refere to “the things” but in fact is a subclause to “believe”

So I think they make me unlovable but they think they are beautiful. Boy, I need a syntax tree to parse this.

Reminds me of this

Is this an I Saw The TV Glow reference? Great movie!

The thing is that AI is a catch all term and the AI used in medicine has little to do with chat bots or generative AI in general.

It’s not that GPT-10 will cure cancer when asked for it. But neural networks are good at pattern recognition so cancer detection is a promising application for example. Also, personalizing a cure is also an idea. It’s not that we need a super intelligence and curing cancer is the excuse for data centers for scam bots. Medical AI is no excuse for generative AI.

Some people think autism means taking everything literally but that’s actually kleptomania

2D chess

It’s not even Halloween and you can buy Christmas stuff! The two seasons solution has always been a lie

It’s like the war on terror and the war on drugs. Declaring war on something always makes it stronger

Neither are QOOP or BOOD

Even with gills, the mouth is where they breath in

I think the most reasonable definition is that bi means you are into either and pan means you don’t care. So bi means you have two “prototypes” you’re into, one male and one female, and pan means your “prototype” is not gendered. Having a gendered prototype doesn’t mean it excludes trans people. A trans person can be close enough to either or both, depending on their state of transition and your focus. I hope I’m making sense.

In an alternative universe it would be call a thought experiment

But would you ever date a Jessica?

Can I make it anymore obvious

Not really. Painting AI as super powerful is a narrative to push current AI (which is not super powerful but will be any day now, trust me bro) and distract from real problems like the climate crisis which the meme is about

The answer is correct unless you double check it and where would you double check if not asking the same machine again