If nukes are an excuse to prevent all conventional intervention, then nukes are a free pass to commit any crimes one wishes against non-nuclear powers
That is the assumption Russia is operating under.
If nukes are an excuse to prevent all conventional intervention, then nukes are a free pass to commit any crimes one wishes against non-nuclear powers
That is the assumption Russia is operating under.
More precise than dropping a bomb on an appartment building, I suppose…
But, yeah, not the best example of preventing collateral damage.
this is a fringe right-wing party with one seat in Japanese Parliament’s lower house.
One seat too many, if this is the attitude of their leader.
I was being a little sarcastic in my first post,
Your mistake was not using the /s to indicate that.
Poe’s law is a thing.
Remember Poe’s law.
I really hope that was intended as sarcasm and that you simply omitted the /s
Europe has already been pulling their weight in Ukraine. Now they’ll also have to pick up the slack that they US is about to create.
The worst people who can afford the best skilled lawyers have been trying that kind of shenanigans since the beginning of lawyers and courts.
Seems a bit suspect.
Typical for the Russian legal system
Bordering super powers is actually fine, if you’re not a psycopath
It’s also fine if that superpower isn’t a psychopath.
How many countries that claimed they were communist ever really fit the actual definition?
I can’t think of one.
My kids only knew Linux from the first day they used a computer.
They didn’t have any difficulty transitioning between that at home and the chromebooks or windows desktops the school had.
There’s more to Scandinavian food than lutefisk, y’know.
This is about land,
Wars always are.
But warring factions almost always use the religion of the people as a strong lever and excuse in order to maintain the support of those people for the war effort.
This is no different. There have been strong and influential factions (on both sides of the conflict) who have claimed that the piece of dirt they’re fighting over is holy land to both of the religions represented.
concerns over the possibility that religion might be a political opponent and trying to neutralize it by replacing figures with one’s own are not new.
It’s been a pretty common thing that dictators have done throughout recorded history.
It’s not about agreeing or disagreeing with the specifics of the church, it’s about eliminating divided loyalties.
Dictators always do that.
And, not because they’re atheists as the butthurt Christians so often claim.
It’s all about centralized control and not allowing for divided loyalties or spaces for people to gather outside the party’s control.
a reasonable amount of economic output
There’s a vast difference between "reasonable " and “max_profits nothing else matters”.
That’s as silly as Trump claiming he could stop it (or the Russian invasion of Ukraine) with a single phone call.
Israel has been fighting against its neighbors since its inception.
God: you have free will
Also God: you’d better make the choices I dictate or you’ll be punished eternally in the most unimaginable hellscape possible.
Maybe they’re hoping for a “This is what your country will look like if everyone continues to ignore this problem” reaction from the attendees?
Or maybe it’s just the place that offered the most kickbacks to the organizers…