• 0 Posts
  • 36 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 2nd, 2020

help-circle
  • this is a complex topic and probably belongs in a different thread.

    essentially i don’t personally believe in punishing citizens of a country for the actions of its politicians.

    at best its misguided, at worse it basically empowers politicians on both sides who draw power from friction between citizens of different nations. typical divide and conquer bs.

    why do you not think a software developer wouldn’t have to

    wouldn’t or shouldn’t? if you mean wouldn’t, it’s not surprising and its not the dev’s fault they have to comply with policy, so the criticism is not with them.

    if you mean shouldn’t, i don’t agree with punishing athletes either, but regarding foss specifically, isn’t the “friendly competition” of olympics equivalent to that? sort of. in some ways yes. in other ways its actually the opposite.

    collaboration is actually the opposite of competition.

    and while there’s a case for the benefits of healthy sports competition, i don’t believe it truly fulfills the spirit of international goodwill to the degree it says on the packaging. foss an other forms of international collaboration for the betterment of greater society are definitely on a higher rung - in my opinion at least.



  • ganymede@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlRace mixing is communism
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    gonna use this as an opportunity to launch my ted talk:

    there’s no such thing as anything but “race mixing” since every single human on the planet is a mix of different ancient races anyway

    (or to put another way, race is a bs term anyway since we’re all homosapiens)



  • When you work in an industry where the entire collaborative workflow of everyone is based on software that doesn’t run on Linux, then not running that software is equal to not being able to work in that industry.

    there’s no denying that’s true, though ofc it has alot to do with microsofts very agreessive and anti-competitive practices.

    though its all a bit tangential, the main issue i think comes down to what someone means when they say “everything”. certainly if someone said “you can do everything”, i’d expect them to qualify what is (should be) obviously a slight exaggeration as parlance. they don’t literally mean “everything” they just mean most everyday things. i think its fairly common in everyday speech for someone to be able to work out thats what they meant.

    in the few rare cases when someone literally means absolutely everything, then yes that silly statement would be incorrect. and if strictly intended with that meaning would certainly qualify as misinformation.



  • ganymede@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlWe chose... poorly
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Yeah I don’t know. Just see how the modern world is shaping society to the negative I just don’t see where we are close to utopia But right now we are on a different path

    That was essentially a big part of my point. We could be close to a utopia by now (from the perspective of technological possibilities).

    Instead, as I said

    for some suspicious reason we took a very different road, and here we are

    That said I don’t currently believe technology itself is inherently bad.

    Like all tools, it depends what you do with it.

    Is a general purpose tool like hammer good or bad? It has the capacity for both. And therefore it’s up to the user which is which.

    And that’s the issue really, what are we doing with our wonderous technology?

    This might be a bit of a radical take. But in that ~125 year window i was refering to, alot of machines we’ve invented are actually weapons.

    Weapons to destroy eachother physically (conflict/threats of violence etc).

    Weapons to destroy nature (deforestation and probably most mining).

    Weapons to destroy the mind (social media etc, actually most media now).

    What if we’d had 1+¼ century of building a collective utopia instead of all these weapons?

    afaict from the technical perspective it’s not really unfeasible, its the non-technical problem: the user and what they use the tools for.

    Another clue for us is probably the term appropriate technology, which is a vibe i think eg. solar punk is helping to cultivate.

    Anyway we’ve done ALOT of misuse. That’s why i don’t blame technology itself.

    I still think it’s more about what we’ve done with it.


  • ganymede@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlWe chose... poorly
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    necessary decline in our quality of life

    i’m not refuting your core premise.

    but on the note of this issue, not sure i can agree.

    have a look at this public infrastructure technology from 122 years ago:

    Youtube/Invidious

    imagine if we’d spent the last 1+¼ century collectively working towards the utopia this kind of project hinted at - instead of developing new machines to destroy?

    typically they say utopian dreams scatter in the face of increased technological awareness. have to say my experience has been the opposite.

    the more i learn about technology, the more i realise we could probably be very close to a near-utopia by now. for some suspicious reason we took a very different road, and here we are.




  • i agree with everything you’ve said including your links between causation etc

    except the final link you make that its the consumer, i note you said ‘partly’ a consumer issue, so its not a full attribution - perhaps i’m misinterpreting what % you’re attributing.

    tbh my take is alot of people would like an option between paying $2 for a garment they know involved exploitation/slavery vs an accessible1 independent option that doesn’t cost $500/garment.

    i don’t think people are still choosing the $2 option because they’re ok with slavery. but (tragically?) they’re more ok with someone else being the slave vs them being the slave - which is what they’d basically be if every piece of clothing cost them $500.

    and i think we know the reason there’s very little accessible options in between is because the game is rigged, you (HelixDab2) can’t realistically enter the game without serious capital behind you (ie. wealth/connections) to reach the volume prices which might give us an option in between - the market isn’t fair, its been stitched up long ago, by the same people who don’t produce anything and greedily skim off the top.

    the venn diagram of independent designers fairly charging $500 for their labor and the greedy skimmers getting fat without producing anything themselves is two separate circles - they’re worlds apart

    1 Quick note on accessibility, there are ofc some scant options between $2-500, but what isn’t clear (ie. readily accessible) to the consumer is which of those options isn’t just some greedy bastard buying a $2 option and selling it on for $15.







  • ganymede@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    not customizable

    themes, plugins, ridiculously easy custom configurations/build commands etc you can even control the window manager from config files if you want to, its insanely customisable

    lacks support for a lot of things

    edit: trying to sound less snarky, but do you have a lot of examples?

    i could see these criticisms arising from a quick glance. or we may have slightly different definitions of these terms. which is fair enough.

    imo geany’s ratio of features to weight is remarkable, perhaps singularly so?


  • if you wanna continue to embarrass yourself go ahead. i won’t be entertaining this sad display any longer.

    anyone is free to search the thread and read what i wrote in the full context it was stated.

    and to see your blatant dishonesty.

    good luck mate, i hope you find some kind of peace to whatever is keeping you so fixated about windows users that you need to fabricate an enemy in me over that aspect, despite me clearly and repeatedly denouncing it from day 1 of this discussion. all the best.



  • nowhere in this entire essay, nor in any of your other comments for that matter, do you even address my point that lumping in Windows users with the immoral actions of a company results in a harmful dissonance

    anyone can see the scrollback for themselves, it’s plainly visible i denounced it multiple times. the evidence is right here for anyone to see:

    But then you learn they got rich by cutting corners and screwing over your friends. And are actively investing in making the public pool shit so they can grandstand their pool. Noone is blaming you for going up to the rich guys pool to have a nice easy time. Or at least, I’m not defending the kind of linux zealots who might blame you for choosing that

    Source

    As I mentioned, I’m not here to criticise you for making the choice you have, or defend those who do criticise you for it.

    Source

    As stated we are not listing reasons for condemning you for your choice

    Source

    As stated many times, you are welcome to your choice, and your choice is understandable.

    Source

    dude its just sad at this point. why are you bothering to pretend its not addressed when its addressed repeatedly and was even requoted like 2 posts before you made your ridiculous, verifiably false statement.

    what is the purpose of this game? who do you think you’re kidding? anyone can see you’re being dishonest. and don’t even have the grace to admit it, you’re wrong. completely wasting an opportunity for us both to learn and for us to be friends even.

    whats even stranger is the original discussion was about linux community shitting on windows NOT windows users:

    The Linux community shitting on Windows is worse

    Source

    you’ve fixated on this windows user issue when, as quoted, it was never even about that, was already denounced by me immediately as quoted & sourced repeatedly above.

    i can see why you think linux users are smug arseholes, you pull this shit and cry when you don’t get away with it. its just sad dude. noone at microsoft is paying for your time to get invested like this. you think you give a fuck about you???

    but you know who might actually give a fuck about you? us, here, in this community. but you need to start by being honest with yourself about this, otherwise you are the one making it a waste of time.