awesome

It affects my associations in that I don’t use some of the applications and platforms they, the larger society, use to interact with each other and also that I am reluctant to even contact people at all if they have spyware or LLMs in their phones, cars, computers, etc.

As for if it will affect the way in which people already under heavy surveillance interact with each other, I expect psyops to be extremely effective currently but clearly not absolute as demonstrated by fascists and China losing the US election.

What is a content algorithm if not surveilling and studying civilians to push chosen content in front of them and control how they act, what they buy, where they travel, etc.

Getting banned for opposing tankies is a badge of honor, go straight ahead, nazi sympathizer.

Respecting Tankies? You might as well be asking me to pay respects to Adolf Hitler, fat chance mate.

Yeah but the concept was extracting money FOR the government and not FROM the government. If you’re going to add the regulation and also charge them for the whole process then you might as well just tax them more, instead of this whole convoluted plot.

All aid to Gaza immediately ended upon Trump entering office, and Trump bragged about delivering 2,000 LBS bombs that the Biden admin withheld.

The ones here on the fediverse support Trump and Putin, the ones in Beijing provided the guns and funding for the October music festival attack which began the war on Gaza. Image attached:

Add industry self-regulating and user-manual printing standards which include disassembly and reassembly.

Example Given: You make a router? You have to buy an office to do a teardown on the router and show schematics and performance and submit the required information to an industry run forum (not like a web forum, more like a consortium).

The foreign company will be forced to set their own firm up to avoid paying the market rates, and if they try to weasel out of it by pulling a Panama-Papers esque operation it will open up the possibility of sueing and fining them or evem outright arresting bad actors.

Its because of Lemmy being built by pro-genocide, pro-authoritarian, anti-trans communist Republicans.

Well, not all of them. Some of them are a stain on this earth.

Flash drives I have no idea, but I remember when we ditched those fuckin Mouse Cables for “high speed” USB 2.0 in the early 2000s and it felt really good.

Well, look, if we believe the collapse is inevitable it certainly would be quite a coincidence to be concurrent with newly ellected US Lawmakers yelling as loud as they can on a public forum “WE’RE COLLAPSING THIS BUBBLE STARTING JANUARY”.

Well, yes, but the end result of her doing her very necessary job is undeniably an AI stock slump possibly crash. Rather I think we shouldn’t treat it as any sort of negative thing that they collapse in the first place. After all, these firms created negative value. No sympathy for investors in this specifically.

Just imagine sending them all into bankruptcy so deep they have to sell off 2/3rds of their properties to dozens of smaller firms, OMG IM CLOSE

I like that the DNC have already added investigator roles to the hiring site, lmao.

I would argue that a human brain is a statistical model.

You’d be wrong. Humans are a series of logic gates which don’t strictly compare values odds. We actually kind of suck at statistics.

Even your cited headlines specify that it’s just the US User Data stored in USA, lmfao. Beijing accesses that data everytime it serves videos, its meaningless to claim TikTok is owned by anybody but the Chinese Military.

TikTok is a server in Beijing, always has been and always will be. They demonstrated they were more willing to shut it down than change that. The Trump sweetheart deal which keeps it illegally operating is that they have to sell a copy of the user data to Trump’s zionist friends hosted on Oracle cloud servers.

Sure, that is true right now. But in not-so-distant future

Today it is a statistical model

Tomorrow it is a statistical model

Check out the OpenAI peer review article on “AI Scaling Laws”, although it had its math corrected by the staff of DeepMind later on it still more or less correctly predicted the performance of every model since and predicts that we’re hitting a hard limit soon as training approaches infinite but returns become smaller and smaller. If you plot the performance as per their charts then the limit after INFINITE training with INFINITE sample data and INFINITE power used then you get about 94% accuracy, which is still less than any one singular human’s capabilities. So why train it when you can just go and get a random human?

Clearly this approach doesn’t work.

You mentioned a theoretical model which adjusts its own weights? We call that self-sampling which leads to feedback loops and model collapse.

If somebody someday far far far into the future manages to invent AI which both approximates an exceeds human capability, which is honestly doubtful because somebody capable of doing so would likely abstain from it, then at that point the AI would likely view humanity as something useful for coexistence rather than some animalistic threat.

Of course the absolute worst way to go about creating such a thing would be the physical and digital reconstruction of human and animal brains and experiences such that it would feel things like fear, self-preservation, and anger, but such attempts probably wouldn’t provide any real value to its creators or financers in the first place.