

I wonder if visualizing what you read slows people down.
Yes, especially when the author probably got their inspiration during an LSD trip.
Just a corn on the internet.
Use the matrix contact @einkorn:tchncs.de for private messages (Lemmy stores DMs in plain text).
🇩🇪 DE/EN 🇬🇧


I wonder if visualizing what you read slows people down.
Yes, especially when the author probably got their inspiration during an LSD trip.
Unlikely, but it would be hilarious if some self-proclaimed alpha male found out the hard way that he is in fact intersex.


Thanks, I will keep this in mind should I ever be overcome by the urge to open a door during flight.


But Ukraine is not part of nato
They had security guaranties from the US and UK after giving up their nuclear weapons inherited from the Soviet Union.
nato members were not happy, they risked a larger scale war by attacking directly. The
They did and do not risk anything.
It became very clear early on, that Russia was all bark and no bite. Russia couldn’t have escalated to an all out European war if they wanted to, while their main psuh was being shredded on a highway towards Kiv. The only option to do so would have been the nuclear one but Putin wants to be Tsar, not dead.
Also even by standards of international law (as if that would account to anything anymore) supplying all sorts of weapons to Ukraine is legal. Any so called red line Moscow drew in the sand has been crossed so far and nothing has happened.
Do you really expect Putin to pull the trigger if European troops enter the battle with the clear communication that they would restore Ukraine to its borders before 2014?


They would very much be willing to conquer the Baltic nations if the opportunity shows itself.
I very much understand that but there is no such opportunity for an all out conquest until NATO is no more.
The author that you referred to, does he speak russian? Estonian? Ukrainian?
I don’t know.


How so?


There is zero chance Russia is ever getting away with that
Is there? Given the rather reluctant support of Ukraine, which is about just enough to keep them in the fight, I’m afraid that at least some NATO members would rather give away a symbolic chunk of land than start a military confrontation. And yes, that would be the end of NATO.


An active fight? Yeah, that’s not going to happen. A passive one, though? Might be an option. Carlo Masala recently published his new book If Russia wins: a scenario (No English translation yet). In it, he draws up a scenario where Russia, after defeating Ukraine, annexes a small Estonian town to test NATO’s resolve in the face of a limited Russian aggression. He bases this scenario on the German Re-occupation of the Rhineland, during which German troops had they faced any serious resistance by allied forces would have had to retreat. In the book NATO members are divided and dismiss the Estonians request for help under Article 5.


Well, we might find out soon enough.


Historical? Maybe. That depends on how you define “historical”. Israel was founded almost 80 years ago. Is that already history? Personally I’d argue yes.
But what legitimizes a state anyway? IMHO it’s not because there has been some vague entity there for X years. Typing this response I came more and more to the conclusion for myself that states have no legitimacy in and of themselves: Why is this border here and not 5 meters further? Especially in Africa and oftentimes in the middle east this is a question that can be answered by “because some old white guys drew lines on a map”. Legitimacy of a state I think, derives mostly from it’s government and whether or not this government can execute their core functions: Representing and providing for it’s people.


When Copenhagen signed […] in December 2023, the idea […] was quite a different proposition to what it is today.
It’s a deal from 2023 not today.


It’d be really interesting to know when and how Orbán flipped from a moderate progressive mindset to autocratic dictator.


The only time I ever had to take a drug test was while crossing into Switzerland.


Or they only get in at all if they commit to providing said nukes for defence of the EU. Can be a double edged sword. As far as I can see the UK has been considerably worse of in terms of their economy without the EU than the EU without the UK. The nukes might very well be the requirement, not the cherry on top.


Oh for fucks sake, I thought we dodged at least this bullet …


I mean, every country has some sort of racially/ethnically motived violence. Humans in general are stupid.


That and he doesn’t want to lose the option of a coalition partner in the future.


Well, then why not put all that money into technology that helps people in a couple of months already?


Yeah, but that was under a woman! A WOMAN! Bless the Lord, we have proper leadership again! /s
I use https://imgflip.com/