Nah, nah, it was the International Phonetic Alphabet. Can’t have something like that on the 'murican internet.
Nah, nah, it was the International Phonetic Alphabet. Can’t have something like that on the 'murican internet.
But… If you claim you’re always wrong, that means you’re always right, which mean you’re always wrong, which means you’re always right, which mean you’re always wrong, which means you’re always right, which mean you’re always wrong, which means you’re always right, which mean you’re always wrong, which means you’re always right, which mean you’re always wrong, which means you’re always right, which mean you’re always wrong, which means you’re always right…
For all the memes, Arch has not once broken on me.
None of that is chromium. Vivaldi could have built that on top of Firefox, but didn’t. As to why Firefox is better, the very fact that it’s an alternative that is keeping up technically is a benefit. It’s less a ‘V-shaped engine’ monopoly and moreso a ‘V8 engine made by a specific company’ monopoly. They have far too much control over the direction of web standards. Much of what they are doing is actually good, but it should then be spread based on merit, rather than because they directly control almost the entire market.
The install script one hasn’t aged particularly well. Although I haven’t used the official one, so maybe it’s not up to IRC standards. Everything else though, totally on point. When is this from?